Windows NT 3.51 was significant in adding support for the PowerPC processor from IBM. Â Because this release was delayed for the PowerPC port, it was very stable when it came out as over a thousand bugs had been addressed in between 3.5 & 3.51 .
3.51 was released inÂ May of 1995 right before the launch of Windows 95. Â This made NT 3.51 feel somewhat dated as it still retained the program manager/file manager feel to them, while in August Windows 95 would feature the new explorer shell.
However after the launch of Windows 95, there was work to port the new UI to Windows NT in the form of newshell.
NT Starting to look like 95
Newshell only made it to Beta 2, and was never updated beyond that.
Excel 3.0a and 97 running on NT 3.51
One cool feature of NT 3.51 is that it was supported by Office 95 & 97. Â Combined with the newshell beta it gave NT 3.51 the feeling of being more modern than the dated program manager feeling NT 3.1-3.51 …
Of my test programs, they all continue to run flawlessly. Â Even SQL Server 4.21 happily runs as a service on NT 3.51.
I figured it was worth doing a quick video of what the new shellÂ experienceÂ was like on NT.
By this time NT was starting to look and feel like a dated system because of the reliance on Program manager. Of course we all knew it would be addressed in the next version of NT, Windows NT 4.0
With Windows NT 3.1 out the door there was a LOT of work to be done behind the scenes to bring Windows NT up to a more polished level, and this was most certainly achieved with Windows NT 3.5 . This version did something pretty much unheard of, which is that it dropped the hardware requirements from Windows NT 3.1 . It is almost all too easy to get lost in all the new features but I’ll try to keep a list.
OpenGL (software only)
New TCP/IP Stack
More complete Win32 support
Ability to run Win16 apps in separate WOW instances.
Added complete support for the Dec Alpha
IDE CD-ROM support
For me this was a major release, in that now Windows NT was actually usable, esp with the memory requirement dropped, and the overall speed increased NT 3.5 could actually be used. Â The dialup PPP support that was a SNAP to configure was the thing that won me over, I never could get the dialup scripts for CHAP/PAP/PPP on Linux to work right, but within a few minutes of installing NT 3.5, I was on the internet.
One of the cools things that came out of the Microsoft SGiÂ collaborativeÂ was OpenGL on Windows NT. Â This was no doubt to bring NT into the real ‘workstation’ level of OS, and to give us greatÂ real-timeÂ 3d graphics. Â This was also the source of a lot of ‘server issues’ because people *LOVED* the OpenGL screen savers so much they enabled them everywhere, not realizing that they would easily take 100% of the CPU. Â The OpenGL was so good, that it even scaled on SMP systems, again killing them for 100% of the CPU across all CPUs. Â You wouldn’t be very popular loading them on the departmental SQL server.
Outside of internet applications all I pretty much ran at the time was old Win16 stuff like Turbo C++ for Windows, Watcom C++ and I’d try to run windows games, but NT just needed too much memory compared to MS-DOS/Windows 3.1 … it was a while before memory got cheap enough to tip the balance, but I did only have 8MB back then.
As for the applications I installed on NT 3.1, they all worked fine, MS-Word for DOS & OS/2, Excel 3, and Doom 1.1 ran great.
I should also mention that there was a 32bit version of Office for NT 3.5, Office 4.2 for NT. This added 32bit versions of Word & Excel for NT Alpha/i386. Â I don’t think there was ever native versions for the MIPS.
Windows NT 3.5Â receivedÂ three service packs before it was ultimately superceeded by Windows NT 3.51
Originally planned as OS/2 3.0, OS/2 NT, or Portable OS/2, Windows NT began life as a portable version of OS/2 2.0 for RISC processors. Â Even in the early design phase, it was decided that it was going to have multiple OS personalities. Â With the arrival of Windows 3.0 everything changed, and it was decided to use WLO, or project porthole the port of Windows 3.0 to OS/2 1.2 as the basis of what would become Win32, the primary personality for OS/2 NT, however they could keep all the kernel work, as none of theÂ initialÂ design would have to be changed when they dumped the OS/2 2.0 cruiser personality.
Because NT was going to be theÂ successorÂ to OS/2, it naturally supported the FAT & HPFSÂ file systems, but in addition it also supported the NTFS filesystem which included the journaling capability allowing it to survive some data loss, and to be able to quickly check the disk.
The NT 3.1 desktop
So after all the betas NT finally shipped in July of 1993. Â The first thing that I was amazed by was the sheer size of it. Â There was an incredibleÂ amountÂ of floppy disks, and fully installed it could easily consume some 50MB for the OS + space for a swapfile. What was also amazing, and confusing for the users is that NT 3.1 looked just like Windows 3.1. Â Even the same games/accessories were included and the look and feel was so much the same that most people couldn’t tell NT from Windows.
Windows NT 3.1 could run MS-DOS applications via the NTVDM (which is still around in 32bit versions of Windows 7!), OS/2 16bit text mode applications, specially compiled POSIX applications (vi was popular among unix people), Win16 applications which again rain inside of the NTVDM, along with a ‘speical’ version of Windows 3.1 which would then translate the system calls to the Win32 subsystem via thunking so that the applications could run seamlessly on the desktop, without requiring complicated drivers, unlike OS/2.Â And of course it could run the new breed of Win32Â executablesÂ which included console, gui and service applications.
The ability for Windows NT to supportÂ multipleÂ user accounts was a big change from the typical Microsoft one user / one computer approach, but it also changed the playing field with being able to run server programs on Windows that you didn’t have to login to the machine, and start yourself. Â The best part being that you could manage these applications with Windows programs! Â While it may seem impossible to imagine now, the big ‘database’ program at the time was Oracle, and if you didn’t have a mainframe or a mini computer to run it on, but wanted to go down the microcomputer path you either ran Oracle for MS-DOS, or you ran it on Novell Netware. Â While networking was in Novell’s blood, setting up networking on MS-DOS could prove a chore. Â Windows NT 3.1 may have shipped without Â a netware requester, but it did include support for DLC, IPX/SPX,Â TCP/IP and NetBEUI. Â This meant that Microsoft SQL Server could talk to more network types than a typical Netware setup. Another game changer was that the networking support, and namely TCP/IP was included in the box! Â Up until this time TCP/IP solutions were typically 3rd party for both Windows, Netware, and even some UNIX (like Xenix!).
It is also worth noting that the TCP/IP in this version is from a 3rd party,Â SpiderTCP although once Microsoft was ready they did release their own stack which was in NT 3.5, an update for Windows for Workgroups that supported things like DHCP.
One major annoyance of OS/2 was that command prompts were either full screen or windowed, but they could not be switched, and some programs were flagged as full screen, so if you ran them from a window the system would flash to full screen, sawn a full screen session, maybe kick out some text, then switch back to the graphical screen. Â It was VERY annoying for tools that expected flags, as then you’d have to switch to a full screen session to even see what was going on. Â Windows NT addressed this off the bat, that VGA based systems could switch between fullscreen & windowed sessions by simply hitting alt+enter, and RISC / framebuffer video systems would be stuck in ‘windowed’ command prompts much like Windows Vista and other systems won’t let the ‘Command prompt’ window go full screen.
One big annoyance about Windows NT 3.1 is that all the Win16 applications (which was what almost everyone was using) ran in a SINGLE VM which meant that a single rouge application could crash out the VM, losing all the other Win16 applications work. Â It wasn’t any better than what Windows 3.0/3.1 users were facing, and only OS/2 allowed people to run Windows application inÂ separateÂ sessions.
Another seriousÂ shortcomingÂ in Windows NT is that the POSIX subsystem is basicallyÂ brain dead, it doesn’t support any networking calls. The inability to port any networking UNIX code to NT made it pretty much worthless, and all I ever saw people do was setup vi on it.
Other than that, for a 1.0 release it supported an incredible amount of printers, sound cards, and even network cards the OS was far more stable than MS-DOS+Windows, although it did need a LOT of memory.. Â Microsoft gave away a TONNE of boxed copies of it back in the day, for all intents and purposes NT 3.1 was a commercial bust, lots of people I know tried it but nobody really used it, it was too slow, and too resource hungry at the time. Â But NT wasn’t written with 80386’s in mind, but rather the future. Â Windows NT 3.1 shipped with support for the MIPS R4000 CPU, and the Intel i386/i486/Pentium. Â The Dec Alpha had not shipped at this point so Alpha support was held back, and offered as a coupon upgrade.
For a test, I thought it’d be a good test to install Microsoft Word 5.5 for MS-DOS / OS/2 as a test, SQL Server 4.21, and Excel 3.0a for Windows. For fun I even installed Doom 1.1 for MS-DOS, which plays however there is no music as NTVDM has noÂ pass throughÂ support to the sound hardware ports (unlike OS/2, I suspect it’dÂ violateÂ the whole principal of a ‘secure’ OS) and since there isn’t any soundblaster emulated devices there won’t be any sound.
Here is some videos of installing Windows NT 3.1 (from within MS-DOS because the CD-ROM support in NT 3.1 is all SCSI based that Qemu doesn’t emulate), and using Windows NT..
Windows NT 3.1 was later replaced by the smaller & more capable Windows NT 3.5 .
I get notes every now and then about people not being able to use Qemu. Â While Qemu is great, cross platform, and free it can be a little crazy to use, esp to people who are scared of the command line.
But rest assured it really isn’t that bad, once when you see the order of its seeming chaos.
Take this string for example:
C:\qemu\NTwalk>..\qemu-1.0.1\qemu-system-i386.exe -L ..\qemu-1.0.1\pc-bios -m 64
-cpu pentium -drive file=nt31disk,if=ide,index=0,media=disk,cache=writeback -ne
t nic,model=pcnet -net user -cdrom “Windows NT 3.1,Â Win32 SDK.iso” -fda “\temp\extensions.img” -soundhw sb16,adlib
Lets break it down as follows:
First I specify the Qemu emulator I’m going to use. Â I’m using the i386 one here, and as you can see, I’m running this from a different directory than where I’m working with disk images.
Next is where I tell Qemu where it can find the needed BIOS files. Â I think there is some global install path, but I tend to run all kinds of versions of Qemu all at once so this will *not* work for me, and it is just easier to tell it where to find them.
I’ve set my VM to a maximum of sixty four megabytes of RAM. Â The default is 128MB, but Â sometimes you want less, as some OS’s can’t use more than 8/16/64 anyways and they may have issues finding RAM where they aren’t expecting it.
Most OS’s will run and boot on a modern CPU, this includes MS-DOS 3.30 which I have booted via a USB floppy controller on my 8core AMD processor. Â However some OS’s fell into the trap of how to identify the processor, and configure themselves accordingly. Â All was well until the Pentium 4, Itanium, and the CORE CPU’s came intoÂ existence.
Â -drive file=nt31disk,if=ide,index=0,media=disk,cache=writeback
With a lot of experimentation I’ve found that this combination works best for qcow2 disk images. Â While a lot more complicated than “-hda nt31disk” it does perform significantly quicker. Â Another ‘tip’ I like is that you can have Qemu mount a directory (as long as it is under 500MB) and it’ll create a virtual FAT-16 formatted disk. Â The flags are [ -hdb fat:<path> ] Â this is a great way to copy in things like device drivers, and even programs. Â However this disk is read only, so you cannot copy data out.
-net nic,model=pcnet -net user
This enables the AMD PCNet PCI network card, and sets it to User mode NAT. Â I like the AMD card as it has really good support. Â With that in mind, Qemu supports the following models:
I’ve never really messed with the tun/tap stuff as you can only have one host on it, so its kind of useless to me. Â With the usermode NAT the VM should be configured the following way if it doesn’t support DHCP:
If you have DNS issues, you may want to try a DNS server that you are using on your physical computer, or perhaps 18.104.22.168/22.214.171.124 . Also you will *NOT* be able to ping outside of the VM, but you *CAN* ping the gateway, 10.0.2.2 .
-cdrom “Windows NT 3.1,Â Win32 SDK.iso”
Just as it appears, this adds an ISO image into the VM which is typically located on the second IDE interface, on the primary port. To force the VM to boot from CD, add the flag ‘-boot d’ and the BIOS will attempt to boot from the CD-ROM.
And like the CD-ROM, this is for the floppy disk. Â Sizes can be 360k, 720k, 1.2M and 1.4M. If you wish to boot from the floppy disk you simply add the flag ‘-boot a’ Â Older floppies will not contain a bootÂ check sum, so to force them to boot, you’ll need the additional flag ‘-no-fd-bootchk’ to ignore theÂ check sumÂ that later diskettes used. Â In my above example I’m just using a disk image, not booting from it.
And finally I’m enabling both the SoundBlaster 16 & Adlib emulation. Â By default in the builds of Qemu the adlib is turned off, but I just turn it back on when I build Qemu. Â Other sound cards include the recent HDA & AC97 chipsets.
Remember the Sound Blaster is configured for an IO base of 0Ã—220, IRQ 5, DMA 1 and High DMA 5.
I hope this gives some insight to users on how toÂ effectivelyÂ use QEMU.
I just found out about, PX00307.pdf, basically its when Microsoft was thinking about breaking away from OS/2 and making the future all Windows based….
Its funny how they say that OS/2 PM has a better API, and at the same time were talking about having NT continue using an INT 21 interface for Windows.. No doubt this is all high level talk, Cutler would have killed anyone for even mentioning INT 21… lol
I wanted to run some old 68000 programs on OS X, but as luck would have it, OS X 10.5 doesn’t support the classical environment, and the 10.4 discs that I have won’t boot on a G5. Â So I don’t have a good way to get there from here. Â However I did remember the great mini vMac is very portable, runs 68000 code great, and even can run 68020 programs with the experimental branches.. So I had to install OS 7 on a Windows machine with my last binary, configure the source there, then import it to my PowerPC, then build it on my G5. Â The OS X PowerPC build is lacking sound (did the intel OS X have it?) but it runs!
Amazingly GCC at this point is pretty snappy, and very ANSI compliant unlike PCC. Â At this point it still relies on native assemblers, linkers, librarians it still was prettyÂ versatile. Back then there was no auto configuration tools you have to link configuration scripts by hand but even on VAX BSD it builds somewhat straightforward (providing you read the documentation)..
GCC 1.21 on 4.2 BSD
I don’t know if it serves any practical value but I went ahead and built a source package for GCC 1.21, along with a 4.2 BSD binary package.. I suspect it’d only be an interest to a select few.. Although if anyone has 1.0 or 0.9 I’d be interested!
By 1991 GCC 1.40 supported not only the i386, but Linux kernel.. And as they say the rest is history.
And finally a video summation of all the changes to GCC…
Back when I was a kid (was I ever a kid), anyways the first machine I was lucky enough to get was a Commodore 64!Â UnfortunatelyÂ I was too young to understand what it was, or what I could even do with it. Â Although they did have commodore computers in our grade school, the whole microcomputer revolution was so new to everyone that they pretty much just sat there until someone came by to show us how to load programs from diskette & tape.
But to be honest ‘educational games’ in 1983/4 really didn’t grab my interest and for the most part my C64 sat dormant. Â However by 1986, I remember this magazine sticking out at some convenienceÂ store, and I was hooked! The whole program in a magazine seemed so awesome, and to be honest the idea of machine code, and having to type in a CRC’d editor was so far fetched to me, that I took MONTHS to get that typed in alone..But without a modem, I suddenly was connected to so many others who were now part of the microcomputer revolution. Â I recently stumbled onto this great archive atÂ commodore.caÂ that has the firstÂ fortyÂ five issues scanned into PDF. Â Its all there, including the ads for things like ‘sublogic football‘ ..