So that 3d Mark 11 bench tool was on sale, and I thought it’d be interesting to judge various machines.
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070(1x) and Intel Core i7-9700K Processor | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980(1x) and Intel Xeon Processor E5-2678 v3 | AMD Radeon R9 290X(1x) and Intel Xeon Processor E5-2620 v2 | |
| 3DMark Score | 23980 | 16351 | 13534 |
| Graphics Score | 29058 | 17585 | 18872 |
| Physics Score | 15672 | 13289 | 7876 |
| Combined Score | 15824 | 13855 | 6623 |
| Graphics Test 1 fps | 1146.83 | 182.54 | 180.92 |
| Graphics Test 2 fps | 2145.84 | 282.38 | 290.27 |
| Graphics Test 3 fps | 3173.27 | 3111.7 | 3124.86 |
| Graphics Test 4 fps | 481.82 | 452.33 | 457.79 |
| Physics Test (fps) | 49.76 | 42.19 | 25 |
| Combined Test (fps) | 73.6 | 64.44 | 30.81 |
One glaring thing is that the old AMD (new ones too??) don’t have any PhysX acceleration so the weak processors shine through. And honestly the 980 is still a really solid card. Assuming yours hasn’t been mined to death.
Going from memory here is roughly what I paid (Yes I bought the RTX 2070 before the announcement of the Supers, and basically it’s too high for right now, but this is what happens in tech, value slides way down).
| RTX 2070 | GTX 980 | R9 290x | |
| price in HKD | $3,739 | $800 | $350 |
| 3DMark Score | 23980 | 16351 | 13534 |
| 3DMark per HKD | 6.41 | 20.44 | 38.67 |
So the biggest bang for the buck is the used stuff. Like it’s not even close. I should probably add in MSRP’s for the old cards. But here we are.
My old GPU was an GTX 460, before I tried out the 1030 & 1050 before making the leap to the 2070. But lately I’ve been looking for old gen cards as they seem to perform pretty well. Also for AutoCad I picked up a P2000. It’s insane how much those cards can go for, and I should bench that one to show how terrible it is at gaming. But wow what a speed difference in CAD.



























