I couldn’t find a Microsoft OS/2 1.2 so on with IBM OS/2 1.2. Â I figured it was still a joint project that IBM should upgrade a Microsoft install.
Into good old fashioned blue on grey. I’m not even going to bother with the dual boot thing, and anyways who cares, right, better dos then dos? right!
New in OS/2 1.2 is the HPFS filesystem. Â I could go on about it’s extended attributes, long file names, speed, but I’m sure others have written far better about it then me. Â Also how it didn’t have any journaling, could crash out easily, and there was no method to map longfilenames onto the 8.3 filesystem could easily leave DOS applications in the dark.
So basically we let it load and hit enter… select a keyboard and..
Again don’t let it format the disk. Â I wonder how many people went ahead and formatted thinking it’d preserve anything… Oh well we’ll keep things FAT for the duration of this exercise. Â Which reminds me, it’s a shame IBM/Microsoft didn’t include a tool to convert FAT to HPFS. Â I guess that was another lesson learned for WindowsNT.
The install also asks if I’d like to keep my old program groups (yes!) and a mouse & serial port. Â The IBM OS/2 1.2 version has no support for PS/2 mice on AT computers. Â Oddly enough the PS/2 driver won’t load on VirtualBOX, so the real fix is to load the OS/2 1.3 PS/2 mouse driver on OS/2 1.2, add it to the mouse driver, and it’ll work fine.
So with the installation out of the way, let’s boot it up!
And here we are, in the OS/2 1.2 GUI. Â Notice how it looks more Windows 3.0’ish which is a nice improvement. Â The timestamps are from 8-31-1989.
Two BIG things that were absent in OS/2 1.1 is the inclusion of a Tutorial, “Introducing OS/2”, and the “OS/2 Command Reference”. Â It’s sure nice having online help for the system commands.
The text mode editor is gone, replaced by the PM e editor.
E seems designed for you to use the mouse, not the alt/arrow keys. Â But that’s how I navigate and I find it kind ofÂ forcefulÂ to alt, then letter to get a command menu. Oh well.
As you can guess by the grey backgrounds, OS/2 doesn’t do wall paper. Â Not even a screen saver. Â As you can see for the late 1980’s and early 1990’s OS/2 is missing out on two of the big sellers for bored office workers. Â It’s an IBM inspired system, which meant GREYS and YAWNS. Â But it sure can multitask, but boy is it BORING.
Oh sure there is a control panel, but it’s mostly rigged to date, time, and the incrediblyÂ convolutedÂ process for adding a printer. Â I’m just glad that my printer has been preserved to this point.
Since this is OS/2 1.2 there is some applications at this point I do have that will work. Â Namely Microsoft Excel 3.0 for OS/2. Â Installation is just like installing Excel 3 on Windows. Â 3 disks, and a reboot.
Since there was no divorce at this point Excel runs just fine.
And PMWord 1.1 (Microsoft Word 1.1 for OS/2). Â So far so good, right?
And it can shutdown! Â So really what are my impressions of OS/2 so far? Â It’s come a LONG way, it’s starting to feel like something workstation esque, but really it’s just so.. barren. Â With the ‘standard’ version you don’t have all the accessories you did get with Windows. Â I know they were largely ‘junk’ but hell even having the windows terminal with X-modem was still awesome for the time as you could actually kind of multitask. It would have been different for OS/2 but you’d never know it. Â IBM & Microsoft really expected people to fall in love with the multitasking, and basically bear with the ultraÂ minimalismÂ of OS/2. Â But Windows 3.0 changed everything.
Anyways, Onward to OS/2 1.3!
OS/2 1.x does wallpaper, e.g. by using Deskpic:
Well that’s kinda cheating…. lol but sometimes cheating is good! I’ll keep that in mind if I rescue another 286…!!!!
You know how you have said that this OS/2 looks like Windows 3? Some say that the Windows 3 UI was actually developed from OS/2.
Windows came first, OS/2 1.1 looks like Windows 2.0. However, Windows 3.0 looks like OS/2 1.2