<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments for Virtually Fun	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://virtuallyfun.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://virtuallyfun.com</link>
	<description>Fun with Virtualization</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 11:46:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Compiling MS-DOS 4.0 from DOS 4.0, on a PS/2! by neozeed		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2024/04/28/compiling-ms-dos-4-0-from-dos-4-0-on-a-ps-2/comment-page-1/#comment-382173</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neozeed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 11:46:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=14409#comment-382173</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://virtuallyfun.com/2024/04/28/compiling-ms-dos-4-0-from-dos-4-0-on-a-ps-2/comment-page-1/#comment-382171&quot;&gt;lpsantil&lt;/a&gt;.

Here is the doc from the zip id found a while back 

https://github.com/neozeed/himem.sys-2.06/blob/main/xms20.doc]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2024/04/28/compiling-ms-dos-4-0-from-dos-4-0-on-a-ps-2/comment-page-1/#comment-382171">lpsantil</a>.</p>
<p>Here is the doc from the zip id found a while back </p>
<p><a href="https://github.com/neozeed/himem.sys-2.06/blob/main/xms20.doc" rel="nofollow ugc">https://github.com/neozeed/himem.sys-2.06/blob/main/xms20.doc</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Compiling MS-DOS 4.0 from DOS 4.0, on a PS/2! by neozeed		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2024/04/28/compiling-ms-dos-4-0-from-dos-4-0-on-a-ps-2/comment-page-1/#comment-382172</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neozeed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 11:28:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=14409#comment-382172</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://virtuallyfun.com/2024/04/28/compiling-ms-dos-4-0-from-dos-4-0-on-a-ps-2/comment-page-1/#comment-382171&quot;&gt;lpsantil&lt;/a&gt;.

It&#039;d be in the zip file, assuming someone didn&#039;t clip it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2024/04/28/compiling-ms-dos-4-0-from-dos-4-0-on-a-ps-2/comment-page-1/#comment-382171">lpsantil</a>.</p>
<p>It&#8217;d be in the zip file, assuming someone didn&#8217;t clip it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Compiling MS-DOS 4.0 from DOS 4.0, on a PS/2! by lpsantil		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2024/04/28/compiling-ms-dos-4-0-from-dos-4-0-on-a-ps-2/comment-page-1/#comment-382171</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lpsantil]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 05:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=14409#comment-382171</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://virtuallyfun.com/2024/04/28/compiling-ms-dos-4-0-from-dos-4-0-on-a-ps-2/comment-page-1/#comment-375503&quot;&gt;neozeed&lt;/a&gt;.

Was there ever a license included with HIMEM.SYS 2.06?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2024/04/28/compiling-ms-dos-4-0-from-dos-4-0-on-a-ps-2/comment-page-1/#comment-375503">neozeed</a>.</p>
<p>Was there ever a license included with HIMEM.SYS 2.06?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Windows XP 2002 for the Itanium: Unbridled rage by neozeed		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2026/08/03/windows-xp-2002-for-the-itanium-unbridled-rage/comment-page-1/#comment-382170</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neozeed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2026 15:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=15864#comment-382170</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://virtuallyfun.com/2026/08/03/windows-xp-2002-for-the-itanium-unbridled-rage/comment-page-1/#comment-382169&quot;&gt;foxcat2&lt;/a&gt;.

yeah just remember it&#039;s a timebombed release 

https://virtuallyfun.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/ia64-202111-winver-expires-1-3-2003.png]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2026/08/03/windows-xp-2002-for-the-itanium-unbridled-rage/comment-page-1/#comment-382169">foxcat2</a>.</p>
<p>yeah just remember it&#8217;s a timebombed release </p>
<p><a href="https://virtuallyfun.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/ia64-202111-winver-expires-1-3-2003.png" rel="ugc">https://virtuallyfun.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/09/ia64-202111-winver-expires-1-3-2003.png</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Windows XP 2002 for the Itanium: Unbridled rage by foxcat2		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2026/08/03/windows-xp-2002-for-the-itanium-unbridled-rage/comment-page-1/#comment-382169</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[foxcat2]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2026 07:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=15864#comment-382169</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[https://archive.org/details/windows-advanced-server-limited-edition_202111
Can this image be launched?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://archive.org/details/windows-advanced-server-limited-edition_202111" rel="nofollow ugc">https://archive.org/details/windows-advanced-server-limited-edition_202111</a><br />
Can this image be launched?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Windows XP 2002 for the Itanium: Unbridled rage by Sebek Adamowicz		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2026/08/03/windows-xp-2002-for-the-itanium-unbridled-rage/comment-page-1/#comment-382168</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sebek Adamowicz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2026 09:14:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=15864#comment-382168</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://virtuallyfun.com/2026/08/03/windows-xp-2002-for-the-itanium-unbridled-rage/comment-page-1/#comment-382167&quot;&gt;neozeed&lt;/a&gt;.

Thank you. Do you have also a key for Windows Server 2003?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2026/08/03/windows-xp-2002-for-the-itanium-unbridled-rage/comment-page-1/#comment-382167">neozeed</a>.</p>
<p>Thank you. Do you have also a key for Windows Server 2003?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Windows XP 2002 for the Itanium: Unbridled rage by neozeed		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2026/08/03/windows-xp-2002-for-the-itanium-unbridled-rage/comment-page-1/#comment-382167</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neozeed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 13:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=15864#comment-382167</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://virtuallyfun.com/2026/08/03/windows-xp-2002-for-the-itanium-unbridled-rage/comment-page-1/#comment-382166&quot;&gt;Sebek Adamowicz&lt;/a&gt;.

I highly doubt they would run on any machine other than mine....]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2026/08/03/windows-xp-2002-for-the-itanium-unbridled-rage/comment-page-1/#comment-382166">Sebek Adamowicz</a>.</p>
<p>I highly doubt they would run on any machine other than mine&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Windows XP 2002 for the Itanium: Unbridled rage by Sebek Adamowicz		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2026/08/03/windows-xp-2002-for-the-itanium-unbridled-rage/comment-page-1/#comment-382166</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sebek Adamowicz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 08:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=15864#comment-382166</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Could you upload the Mac binaries?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could you upload the Mac binaries?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on So what is the deal with A/UX anyways? by Maurício Santos		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2021/09/19/so-what-is-the-deal-with-a-ux-anyways/comment-page-1/#comment-382165</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maurício Santos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 10:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/wordpress/?p=11346#comment-382165</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Snow (https://snowemu.com), a new 68k Mac emulator, is capable of installing and running A/UX versions 1.1, 2.0, and 3.0 much like real hardware, as it competently emulates the Macintosh II and SE/30, along with floppy drives and SCSI CD-ROM drives. Ethernet connectivity is not available, however, because the only emulated network interface currently emulated is the DaynaPORT SCSI/Link, which A/UX does not support. Nevertheless, since serial port emulation works well, TCP/IP networking can be achieved via the native SLIP support (/etc/slattconf) found in all versions. It is a great project (written in Rust), though it still requires some refinement.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Snow (<a href="https://snowemu.com" rel="nofollow ugc">https://snowemu.com</a>), a new 68k Mac emulator, is capable of installing and running A/UX versions 1.1, 2.0, and 3.0 much like real hardware, as it competently emulates the Macintosh II and SE/30, along with floppy drives and SCSI CD-ROM drives. Ethernet connectivity is not available, however, because the only emulated network interface currently emulated is the DaynaPORT SCSI/Link, which A/UX does not support. Nevertheless, since serial port emulation works well, TCP/IP networking can be achieved via the native SLIP support (/etc/slattconf) found in all versions. It is a great project (written in Rust), though it still requires some refinement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Mach386: MACH and BERKELEY UNIX for i386 by neozeed		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2019/07/02/mach386-mach-and-berkeley-unix-for-i386/comment-page-1/#comment-382164</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neozeed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 06:28:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/wordpress/?p=9583#comment-382164</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://virtuallyfun.com/2019/07/02/mach386-mach-and-berkeley-unix-for-i386/comment-page-1/#comment-382163&quot;&gt;niwdanp&lt;/a&gt;.

I&#039;ve actually never installed x11 on mach.  I know it&#039;s got issues in the default setup, like all old x11 with mice devices and setting it to the appropriate dev.

By the time back then I had 16mb of ram, running x11 was such a massive disappointment I&#039;ve never liked it.  From 94 to today X11 and it&#039;s successors are just such a terrible patchwork.

Kind of why I liked NexTSTEP, as no x11.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2019/07/02/mach386-mach-and-berkeley-unix-for-i386/comment-page-1/#comment-382163">niwdanp</a>.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve actually never installed x11 on mach.  I know it&#8217;s got issues in the default setup, like all old x11 with mice devices and setting it to the appropriate dev.</p>
<p>By the time back then I had 16mb of ram, running x11 was such a massive disappointment I&#8217;ve never liked it.  From 94 to today X11 and it&#8217;s successors are just such a terrible patchwork.</p>
<p>Kind of why I liked NexTSTEP, as no x11.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
