<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: So, I used to think Lan Manager Domains and early NT Domains were the same thing	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2024/03/18/so-i-used-to-think-lan-manager-domains-and-early-nt-domains-were-the-same-thing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2024/03/18/so-i-used-to-think-lan-manager-domains-and-early-nt-domains-were-the-same-thing/</link>
	<description>Fun with Virtualization</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2024 11:13:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: user		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2024/03/18/so-i-used-to-think-lan-manager-domains-and-early-nt-domains-were-the-same-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-362180</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[user]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2024 11:13:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=14112#comment-362180</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[You have to set the LAN Manager domain name as workgroup name in Windows NT]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have to set the LAN Manager domain name as workgroup name in Windows NT</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: neozeed		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2024/03/18/so-i-used-to-think-lan-manager-domains-and-early-nt-domains-were-the-same-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-361706</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neozeed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2024 01:27:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=14112#comment-361706</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://virtuallyfun.com/2024/03/18/so-i-used-to-think-lan-manager-domains-and-early-nt-domains-were-the-same-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-361655&quot;&gt;Brian L,&lt;/a&gt;.

I imagine the way to go is to use the client on the early NT Server CD-ROMs.  It&#039;s been ages since I loaded it, but I don&#039;t recall off hand how to actually join a domain.

I think for my imagined UDP to Mailslot to a DDE application I&#039;m going to need to load up multiple NIC&#039;s and multiple stacks.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2024/03/18/so-i-used-to-think-lan-manager-domains-and-early-nt-domains-were-the-same-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-361655">Brian L,</a>.</p>
<p>I imagine the way to go is to use the client on the early NT Server CD-ROMs.  It&#8217;s been ages since I loaded it, but I don&#8217;t recall off hand how to actually join a domain.</p>
<p>I think for my imagined UDP to Mailslot to a DDE application I&#8217;m going to need to load up multiple NIC&#8217;s and multiple stacks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Brian L,		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2024/03/18/so-i-used-to-think-lan-manager-domains-and-early-nt-domains-were-the-same-thing/comment-page-1/#comment-361655</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian L,]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2024 22:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=14112#comment-361655</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I know back in the day I managed to get OS/2 and NT domains to talk to each other, but I can&#039;t remember for the life of me how I did it!  I do remember it being more of a pain on the OS/2 side than the NT 3.51 side, if that helps for anything haha.

config.sys is _not_ our friend, IBM!!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know back in the day I managed to get OS/2 and NT domains to talk to each other, but I can&#8217;t remember for the life of me how I did it!  I do remember it being more of a pain on the OS/2 side than the NT 3.51 side, if that helps for anything haha.</p>
<p>config.sys is _not_ our friend, IBM!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
