<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: On the trail of PCC for the 8086	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2022/11/04/on-the-trail-of-pcc-for-the-8086/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2022/11/04/on-the-trail-of-pcc-for-the-8086/</link>
	<description>Fun with Virtualization</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2023 11:42:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Jerome Mosby		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2022/11/04/on-the-trail-of-pcc-for-the-8086/comment-page-1/#comment-323418</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jerome Mosby]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2023 11:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=12024#comment-323418</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The Gunkies page on 4.1BSD could use some updating.

&quot;The release would have been called 5BSD, but after objections from AT&#038;T the name was changed; AT&#038;T feared confusion with AT&#038;T&#039;s UNIX System V.&quot;
There&#039;s an alternate explanation that says the CSRG DARPA contract paperwork says 4BSD on it so they stuck with 4BSD rather than having to redo the contracts.

&quot;4.1 BSD, June 1981 4BSD was upgraded to include...&quot;
Except 4.1BSD was released on May 20, 1981.

&quot;The bootblock programs do not run under SIMH using the 4.0 BSD strategy&quot;
Time passed and it is not necessary to use tape-swapping to boot 4.1BSD.
See TUHS UnixArchive/Distributions/UCB/4.1BSD-19810901-reconstructed/README &quot;boots just fine following the boot procedure
exactly as described in the official 4.1BSD setup document.&quot;

The CSRG ISO 4.1c2 is older than their 4.1c1

On the CSRG ISO, the ages from oldest to newest: 4.1a, 4.1.snap, 4.1c2,  4.1c1.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Gunkies page on 4.1BSD could use some updating.</p>
<p>&#8220;The release would have been called 5BSD, but after objections from AT&amp;T the name was changed; AT&amp;T feared confusion with AT&amp;T&#8217;s UNIX System V.&#8221;<br />
There&#8217;s an alternate explanation that says the CSRG DARPA contract paperwork says 4BSD on it so they stuck with 4BSD rather than having to redo the contracts.</p>
<p>&#8220;4.1 BSD, June 1981 4BSD was upgraded to include&#8230;&#8221;<br />
Except 4.1BSD was released on May 20, 1981.</p>
<p>&#8220;The bootblock programs do not run under SIMH using the 4.0 BSD strategy&#8221;<br />
Time passed and it is not necessary to use tape-swapping to boot 4.1BSD.<br />
See TUHS UnixArchive/Distributions/UCB/4.1BSD-19810901-reconstructed/README &#8220;boots just fine following the boot procedure<br />
exactly as described in the official 4.1BSD setup document.&#8221;</p>
<p>The CSRG ISO 4.1c2 is older than their 4.1c1</p>
<p>On the CSRG ISO, the ages from oldest to newest: 4.1a, 4.1.snap, 4.1c2,  4.1c1.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
