<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Patching GCC 4.1.2 to build under GCC 8	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2020/08/17/patching-gcc-4-1-2-to-build-under-gcc-8/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2020/08/17/patching-gcc-4-1-2-to-build-under-gcc-8/</link>
	<description>Fun with Virtualization</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2025 09:47:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Alexander Voropai		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2020/08/17/patching-gcc-4-1-2-to-build-under-gcc-8/comment-page-1/#comment-258320</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alexander Voropai]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2020 19:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/wordpress/?p=10430#comment-258320</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[To build GCC 3 for &#039;ns32k&#039; architecture I did a multi-step &quot;downgrade&quot;: build GCC 6 (or 7?) for x86 under modern GCC, build a GCC 3 for i386 with it and finally build cross GCC 3 for &#039;ns32k&#039; target and &#039;i386&#039; host. Fortunately modern linux kernel still runs i386 binaries well (requires 32-bit libraries).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To build GCC 3 for &#8216;ns32k&#8217; architecture I did a multi-step &#8220;downgrade&#8221;: build GCC 6 (or 7?) for x86 under modern GCC, build a GCC 3 for i386 with it and finally build cross GCC 3 for &#8216;ns32k&#8217; target and &#8216;i386&#8217; host. Fortunately modern linux kernel still runs i386 binaries well (requires 32-bit libraries).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: neozeed		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2020/08/17/patching-gcc-4-1-2-to-build-under-gcc-8/comment-page-1/#comment-258067</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neozeed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2020 04:51:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/wordpress/?p=10430#comment-258067</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://virtuallyfun.com/2020/08/17/patching-gcc-4-1-2-to-build-under-gcc-8/comment-page-1/#comment-257928&quot;&gt;Chris M.&lt;/a&gt;.

I can’t say I’m surprised.  Also a.out support seems to be totally hidden in the menu config I had to manually enable it, but even the 32bit kernel won’t run anything from my ancient tool chain.  1.0.9 runs them just fine.

So much for that stable backward support.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2020/08/17/patching-gcc-4-1-2-to-build-under-gcc-8/comment-page-1/#comment-257928">Chris M.</a>.</p>
<p>I can’t say I’m surprised.  Also a.out support seems to be totally hidden in the menu config I had to manually enable it, but even the 32bit kernel won’t run anything from my ancient tool chain.  1.0.9 runs them just fine.</p>
<p>So much for that stable backward support.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Chris M.		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2020/08/17/patching-gcc-4-1-2-to-build-under-gcc-8/comment-page-1/#comment-257928</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris M.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2020 12:13:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/wordpress/?p=10430#comment-257928</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The 5.1.x kernel broke a few things apparently. Last one I knew about was that it broke the AppleTalk networking module (since fixed).

https://www.downtowndougbrown.com/2020/08/hacking-up-a-fix-for-the-broken-appletalk-kernel-module-in-linux-5-1-and-newer/

Just because it compiles without any errors doesn&#039;t mean it&#039;ll work folks :P

Debian is pretty conservative still being on 4.x and it seems to have paid off. Ubuntu has since went to 5.x on a LTS.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 5.1.x kernel broke a few things apparently. Last one I knew about was that it broke the AppleTalk networking module (since fixed).</p>
<p><a href="https://www.downtowndougbrown.com/2020/08/hacking-up-a-fix-for-the-broken-appletalk-kernel-module-in-linux-5-1-and-newer/" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.downtowndougbrown.com/2020/08/hacking-up-a-fix-for-the-broken-appletalk-kernel-module-in-linux-5-1-and-newer/</a></p>
<p>Just because it compiles without any errors doesn&#8217;t mean it&#8217;ll work folks 😛</p>
<p>Debian is pretty conservative still being on 4.x and it seems to have paid off. Ubuntu has since went to 5.x on a LTS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
