<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Messing around with Vistapro 4.0	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2017/10/06/messing-around-vistapro-4-0/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2017/10/06/messing-around-vistapro-4-0/</link>
	<description>Fun with Virtualization</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Oct 2017 07:48:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: neozeed		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2017/10/06/messing-around-vistapro-4-0/comment-page-1/#comment-187588</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neozeed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Oct 2017 07:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=7542#comment-187588</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://virtuallyfun.com/2017/10/06/messing-around-vistapro-4-0/comment-page-1/#comment-187580&quot;&gt;Noth&lt;/a&gt;.

NT MIPS, you mean...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2017/10/06/messing-around-vistapro-4-0/comment-page-1/#comment-187580">Noth</a>.</p>
<p>NT MIPS, you mean&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Noth		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2017/10/06/messing-around-vistapro-4-0/comment-page-1/#comment-187580</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Noth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Oct 2017 02:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=7542#comment-187580</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I used Vista on an A1200/030 with 1 meg fastram / 2 meg chip ram. It took about 45 mins to render a 640x256 image I think, which wasn&#039;t so bad for visualisation. Animation was beyond the reach of this config though... 

Also porting to SGI was a better solution at the time, not NT :)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used Vista on an A1200/030 with 1 meg fastram / 2 meg chip ram. It took about 45 mins to render a 640&#215;256 image I think, which wasn&#8217;t so bad for visualisation. Animation was beyond the reach of this config though&#8230; </p>
<p>Also porting to SGI was a better solution at the time, not NT 🙂</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Chris M.		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2017/10/06/messing-around-vistapro-4-0/comment-page-1/#comment-187578</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris M.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Oct 2017 00:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=7542#comment-187578</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://virtuallyfun.com/2017/10/06/messing-around-vistapro-4-0/comment-page-1/#comment-187552&quot;&gt;neozeed&lt;/a&gt;.

...and going full circle, DeskStation Technology was the OEM involved in the project.  No surprise given that both companies were based out of Kansas.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2017/10/06/messing-around-vistapro-4-0/comment-page-1/#comment-187552">neozeed</a>.</p>
<p>&#8230;and going full circle, DeskStation Technology was the OEM involved in the project.  No surprise given that both companies were based out of Kansas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: neozeed		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2017/10/06/messing-around-vistapro-4-0/comment-page-1/#comment-187552</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neozeed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Oct 2017 02:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=7542#comment-187552</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://virtuallyfun.com/2017/10/06/messing-around-vistapro-4-0/comment-page-1/#comment-187548&quot;&gt;Chris M.&lt;/a&gt;.

I&#039;d never heard of that one.  Apparently it was made in limited numbers.  The real solution was porting to NT.  I&#039;d like to think 16 cores should be plenty fast for 1997]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2017/10/06/messing-around-vistapro-4-0/comment-page-1/#comment-187548">Chris M.</a>.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d never heard of that one.  Apparently it was made in limited numbers.  The real solution was porting to NT.  I&#8217;d like to think 16 cores should be plenty fast for 1997</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Chris M.		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2017/10/06/messing-around-vistapro-4-0/comment-page-1/#comment-187548</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris M.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2017 22:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=7542#comment-187548</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Don&#039;t know about a plain old 68k, but Lightwave 3D rendering on a 33Mhz 68040 equipped Amiga 4000 wasn&#039;t all that fast either. NewTek sold a MIPS(?) based external rendering box called the Toaster Screamer to speed things up.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t know about a plain old 68k, but Lightwave 3D rendering on a 33Mhz 68040 equipped Amiga 4000 wasn&#8217;t all that fast either. NewTek sold a MIPS(?) based external rendering box called the Toaster Screamer to speed things up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
