<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: 4.3BSD syslogd for Windows	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2017/04/13/4-3bsd-syslogd-windows/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2017/04/13/4-3bsd-syslogd-windows/</link>
	<description>Fun with Virtualization</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2017 15:44:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: neozeed		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2017/04/13/4-3bsd-syslogd-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-182120</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neozeed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2017 15:44:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=7046#comment-182120</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://virtuallyfun.com/2017/04/13/4-3bsd-syslogd-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-182117&quot;&gt;DOS&lt;/a&gt;.

I used to use it as well, and the issues are that it&#039;s another layer, and as Microsoft tried to correct the wide open game of memory protection the &#039;hacks&#039; to get a Win32 fork became a nightmare... And of course the performance of going through a layer to do something.  I&#039;d always thought I had to use something like that, but it&#039;s only because I never actually had access to 4.3 back then, nor did I ever try to see if I could just get it to work.... 

It&#039;s more of a wow it really could have worked.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2017/04/13/4-3bsd-syslogd-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-182117">DOS</a>.</p>
<p>I used to use it as well, and the issues are that it&#8217;s another layer, and as Microsoft tried to correct the wide open game of memory protection the &#8216;hacks&#8217; to get a Win32 fork became a nightmare&#8230; And of course the performance of going through a layer to do something.  I&#8217;d always thought I had to use something like that, but it&#8217;s only because I never actually had access to 4.3 back then, nor did I ever try to see if I could just get it to work&#8230;. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s more of a wow it really could have worked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: DOS		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2017/04/13/4-3bsd-syslogd-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-182117</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DOS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2017 14:37:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=7046#comment-182117</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Well  there&#039;s also Cygwin, which I used in the 90s to run syslogd on Windows 95, and which could probably compile tacacsd just fine and would also provide an /etc/passwd file for account details, but that would all be too easy :)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well  there&#8217;s also Cygwin, which I used in the 90s to run syslogd on Windows 95, and which could probably compile tacacsd just fine and would also provide an /etc/passwd file for account details, but that would all be too easy 🙂</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: neozeed		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2017/04/13/4-3bsd-syslogd-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-181854</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neozeed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2017 08:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=7046#comment-181854</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://virtuallyfun.com/2017/04/13/4-3bsd-syslogd-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-181853&quot;&gt;ender&lt;/a&gt;.

I found that one on my search, but I was oddly enough more interested in running 4.3BSD&#039;s syslog if it were possible... What do you think of it?

I have a customer using Kiwi, and it&#039;s painful.  Although they do get between 5-20GB worth of syslogs a day... It&#039;s crazy.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2017/04/13/4-3bsd-syslogd-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-181853">ender</a>.</p>
<p>I found that one on my search, but I was oddly enough more interested in running 4.3BSD&#8217;s syslog if it were possible&#8230; What do you think of it?</p>
<p>I have a customer using Kiwi, and it&#8217;s painful.  Although they do get between 5-20GB worth of syslogs a day&#8230; It&#8217;s crazy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: ender		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2017/04/13/4-3bsd-syslogd-windows/comment-page-1/#comment-181853</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ender]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2017 08:38:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=7046#comment-181853</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[There are actually several free syslog servers for Windows, I&#039;ve been using the following one for the last few years: http://syslog-win32.sourceforge.net]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are actually several free syslog servers for Windows, I&#8217;ve been using the following one for the last few years: <a href="http://syslog-win32.sourceforge.net" rel="nofollow ugc">http://syslog-win32.sourceforge.net</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
