<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: BackOffice Server 4.5 aka how to get the best of 1990&#8217;s Microsoft Server Tech!	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2017/03/12/backoffice-server-4-5-aka-get-best-1990s-microsoft-server-tech/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2017/03/12/backoffice-server-4-5-aka-get-best-1990s-microsoft-server-tech/</link>
	<description>Fun with Virtualization</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2017 01:18:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: neozeed		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2017/03/12/backoffice-server-4-5-aka-get-best-1990s-microsoft-server-tech/comment-page-1/#comment-182243</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neozeed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2017 01:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=6922#comment-182243</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://virtuallyfun.com/2017/03/12/backoffice-server-4-5-aka-get-best-1990s-microsoft-server-tech/comment-page-1/#comment-182242&quot;&gt;adacosta&lt;/a&gt;.

It&#039;s always the way, isnt it?

Microsoft has killed Exchange in the newer small business servers as they are steering everyone towards the hosted office 365 stuff.

I just think it&#039;s neat in the age of fast machines, emulating things like routers, switches, and servers make it possible to build up an entire intranet on a single machine.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2017/03/12/backoffice-server-4-5-aka-get-best-1990s-microsoft-server-tech/comment-page-1/#comment-182242">adacosta</a>.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s always the way, isnt it?</p>
<p>Microsoft has killed Exchange in the newer small business servers as they are steering everyone towards the hosted office 365 stuff.</p>
<p>I just think it&#8217;s neat in the age of fast machines, emulating things like routers, switches, and servers make it possible to build up an entire intranet on a single machine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: adacosta		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2017/03/12/backoffice-server-4-5-aka-get-best-1990s-microsoft-server-tech/comment-page-1/#comment-182242</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[adacosta]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2017 00:33:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=6922#comment-182242</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Ex-friend sent me the Back Office 4.5 MSDN CDs nearly 15 years ago. Didn&#039;t have the hardware resources to run it back then, since I was limited to a 1999 IBM Aptiva and I wasn&#039;t going to mess with it. 

About 5 to 7 years ago, I had installed it in Virtual PC, had Exchange setup and was able to manage a Windows NT 3.1 and 4.0 Workstations from it. Even had Outlook 97 working and Web Access. I must say, it was really easy to use. Got bored eventually. Probably should give it a try again. I also have Small Business Server 2000 and 2003, but never played with them. 15 years ago, when I dreamed of having access to all this software and what I would do, now I do and I don&#039;t care. 

I should check my MSDN sub to see if they still host the defunct Mid Market Server 2008 and another variant.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ex-friend sent me the Back Office 4.5 MSDN CDs nearly 15 years ago. Didn&#8217;t have the hardware resources to run it back then, since I was limited to a 1999 IBM Aptiva and I wasn&#8217;t going to mess with it. </p>
<p>About 5 to 7 years ago, I had installed it in Virtual PC, had Exchange setup and was able to manage a Windows NT 3.1 and 4.0 Workstations from it. Even had Outlook 97 working and Web Access. I must say, it was really easy to use. Got bored eventually. Probably should give it a try again. I also have Small Business Server 2000 and 2003, but never played with them. 15 years ago, when I dreamed of having access to all this software and what I would do, now I do and I don&#8217;t care. </p>
<p>I should check my MSDN sub to see if they still host the defunct Mid Market Server 2008 and another variant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: neozeed		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2017/03/12/backoffice-server-4-5-aka-get-best-1990s-microsoft-server-tech/comment-page-1/#comment-181511</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neozeed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2017 12:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=6922#comment-181511</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://virtuallyfun.com/2017/03/12/backoffice-server-4-5-aka-get-best-1990s-microsoft-server-tech/comment-page-1/#comment-181509&quot;&gt;calvin&lt;/a&gt;.

Sounds cool though!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2017/03/12/backoffice-server-4-5-aka-get-best-1990s-microsoft-server-tech/comment-page-1/#comment-181509">calvin</a>.</p>
<p>Sounds cool though!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: calvin		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2017/03/12/backoffice-server-4-5-aka-get-best-1990s-microsoft-server-tech/comment-page-1/#comment-181509</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[calvin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2017 12:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=6922#comment-181509</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[fwiw, the IRCd was in Exchange 5.5. 2000 (at least the one in SBS 2000) replaces it with an MSNP IM server, using MSN Messenger.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fwiw, the IRCd was in Exchange 5.5. 2000 (at least the one in SBS 2000) replaces it with an MSNP IM server, using MSN Messenger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: neozeed		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2017/03/12/backoffice-server-4-5-aka-get-best-1990s-microsoft-server-tech/comment-page-1/#comment-180792</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neozeed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2017 15:29:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=6922#comment-180792</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://virtuallyfun.com/2017/03/12/backoffice-server-4-5-aka-get-best-1990s-microsoft-server-tech/comment-page-1/#comment-180324&quot;&gt;Chris M.&lt;/a&gt;.

I&#039;m finally getting some traction using VDE as interconnects+dynamips running Cisco IOS...

Old crap net is slowly happening...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2017/03/12/backoffice-server-4-5-aka-get-best-1990s-microsoft-server-tech/comment-page-1/#comment-180324">Chris M.</a>.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m finally getting some traction using VDE as interconnects+dynamips running Cisco IOS&#8230;</p>
<p>Old crap net is slowly happening&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: neozeed		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2017/03/12/backoffice-server-4-5-aka-get-best-1990s-microsoft-server-tech/comment-page-1/#comment-180703</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neozeed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2017 12:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=6922#comment-180703</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://virtuallyfun.com/2017/03/12/backoffice-server-4-5-aka-get-best-1990s-microsoft-server-tech/comment-page-1/#comment-180691&quot;&gt;techfury90&lt;/a&gt;.

Well that is kind of cool! .. How do you connect? on a LAN with DLC?  SDLC cards?

I really should have ran a packet capture when I used to have access to a mainframe to get the LU going active, and a terminal session going live, along with input &amp; output..... Don&#039;t know why I never did.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2017/03/12/backoffice-server-4-5-aka-get-best-1990s-microsoft-server-tech/comment-page-1/#comment-180691">techfury90</a>.</p>
<p>Well that is kind of cool! .. How do you connect? on a LAN with DLC?  SDLC cards?</p>
<p>I really should have ran a packet capture when I used to have access to a mainframe to get the LU going active, and a terminal session going live, along with input &#038; output&#8230;.. Don&#8217;t know why I never did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: techfury90		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2017/03/12/backoffice-server-4-5-aka-get-best-1990s-microsoft-server-tech/comment-page-1/#comment-180691</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[techfury90]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2017 08:08:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=6922#comment-180691</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I have actually used SNA Server in a hobby network. Granted, all I did was hook it up to one of my AS/400s and use 5250 terminal emulation.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have actually used SNA Server in a hobby network. Granted, all I did was hook it up to one of my AS/400s and use 5250 terminal emulation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: neozeed		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2017/03/12/backoffice-server-4-5-aka-get-best-1990s-microsoft-server-tech/comment-page-1/#comment-180363</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neozeed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2017 18:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=6922#comment-180363</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[OK Im a slacker, let me put something together..... maybe this is the time to mess with VDE...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK Im a slacker, let me put something together&#8230;.. maybe this is the time to mess with VDE&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: neozeed		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2017/03/12/backoffice-server-4-5-aka-get-best-1990s-microsoft-server-tech/comment-page-1/#comment-180333</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neozeed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2017 00:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=6922#comment-180333</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://virtuallyfun.com/2017/03/12/backoffice-server-4-5-aka-get-best-1990s-microsoft-server-tech/comment-page-1/#comment-180324&quot;&gt;Chris M.&lt;/a&gt;.

the site is down... Although what I was thinking was a bridge, so you would run this on a windows or unix/os x machine on your network, and it then picks up the apple talk packets and sends them to other bridges.  that way you only need one machine to do the bridging, and the othermachines just need ethenet...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2017/03/12/backoffice-server-4-5-aka-get-best-1990s-microsoft-server-tech/comment-page-1/#comment-180324">Chris M.</a>.</p>
<p>the site is down&#8230; Although what I was thinking was a bridge, so you would run this on a windows or unix/os x machine on your network, and it then picks up the apple talk packets and sends them to other bridges.  that way you only need one machine to do the bridging, and the othermachines just need ethenet&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Chris M.		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2017/03/12/backoffice-server-4-5-aka-get-best-1990s-microsoft-server-tech/comment-page-1/#comment-180324</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris M.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2017 21:37:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=6922#comment-180324</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hobbyist Appletalk? Done! http://www.synack.net/~bbraun/avpn.html

Although its not a &quot;traditional&quot; Appletalk network, just a tunnel to a netatalk server over TCP/IP. There are Appletalk tunneling (over TCP/IP) protocols out there that can connect two networks, but they weren&#039;t widely supported outside of the Shiva Fastpath 5 or the Cayman Gatorbox routers.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hobbyist Appletalk? Done! <a href="http://www.synack.net/~bbraun/avpn.html" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.synack.net/~bbraun/avpn.html</a></p>
<p>Although its not a &#8220;traditional&#8221; Appletalk network, just a tunnel to a netatalk server over TCP/IP. There are Appletalk tunneling (over TCP/IP) protocols out there that can connect two networks, but they weren&#8217;t widely supported outside of the Shiva Fastpath 5 or the Cayman Gatorbox routers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
