<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Installing Windows NT 3.1 on a physical computer	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2016/10/26/installing-windows-nt-3-1-physical-computer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2016/10/26/installing-windows-nt-3-1-physical-computer/</link>
	<description>Fun with Virtualization</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2023 09:44:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: neozeed		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2016/10/26/installing-windows-nt-3-1-physical-computer/comment-page-1/#comment-174576</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neozeed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2016 02:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=6566#comment-174576</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://virtuallyfun.com/2016/10/26/installing-windows-nt-3-1-physical-computer/comment-page-1/#comment-174568&quot;&gt;Yuhong Bao&lt;/a&gt;.

I never tried, I only kept the 3.x stuff up to 4.0 ..]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2016/10/26/installing-windows-nt-3-1-physical-computer/comment-page-1/#comment-174568">Yuhong Bao</a>.</p>
<p>I never tried, I only kept the 3.x stuff up to 4.0 ..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Yuhong Bao		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2016/10/26/installing-windows-nt-3-1-physical-computer/comment-page-1/#comment-174568</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yuhong Bao]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2016 21:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=6566#comment-174568</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[As a side note, Win2000/NT5 NTLDR has Int 13h extensions support. I wonder if you could use that to boot NT 3.1.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a side note, Win2000/NT5 NTLDR has Int 13h extensions support. I wonder if you could use that to boot NT 3.1.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: neozeed		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2016/10/26/installing-windows-nt-3-1-physical-computer/comment-page-1/#comment-174521</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neozeed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2016 04:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=6566#comment-174521</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://virtuallyfun.com/2016/10/26/installing-windows-nt-3-1-physical-computer/comment-page-1/#comment-174512&quot;&gt;Yuhong Bao&lt;/a&gt;.

I can&#039;t patch my BIOS, so as always I just use the &lt;a href=&quot;https://virtuallyfun.superglobalmegacorp.com/2009/08/23/tip-on-memory-for-windows-nt-3-1-users/&quot;&gt;NTLOADER from NT 3.51&lt;/a&gt;.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2016/10/26/installing-windows-nt-3-1-physical-computer/comment-page-1/#comment-174512">Yuhong Bao</a>.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t patch my BIOS, so as always I just use the <a href="https://virtuallyfun.superglobalmegacorp.com/2009/08/23/tip-on-memory-for-windows-nt-3-1-users/">NTLOADER from NT 3.51</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Yuhong Bao		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2016/10/26/installing-windows-nt-3-1-physical-computer/comment-page-1/#comment-174512</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yuhong Bao]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2016 23:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=6566#comment-174512</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I recommend that you see:
http://www.os2museum.com/wp/windows-nt-3-1-and-os2-memory-detection/]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recommend that you see:<br />
<a href="http://www.os2museum.com/wp/windows-nt-3-1-and-os2-memory-detection/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.os2museum.com/wp/windows-nt-3-1-and-os2-memory-detection/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: neozeed		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2016/10/26/installing-windows-nt-3-1-physical-computer/comment-page-1/#comment-174386</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neozeed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2016 14:38:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=6566#comment-174386</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://virtuallyfun.com/2016/10/26/installing-windows-nt-3-1-physical-computer/comment-page-1/#comment-174325&quot;&gt;Urs Pfister&lt;/a&gt;.

If I wanted to run it under emulation (like my &lt;a href=&quot;http://winnt31.superglobalmegacorp.com/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;NT 3.1 Apache server&lt;/a&gt;), I would pick a far stronger host machine, than a P4 (or below).  The whole point of going native is to actually have the hardware in question.

Now if it offered peripheral passthru maybe, but really, if say I was passing thru a video card, and storage, what would I need qemu for?  Other than trying to restrict the CPU... but passthru seems to be far more of an art than a science.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2016/10/26/installing-windows-nt-3-1-physical-computer/comment-page-1/#comment-174325">Urs Pfister</a>.</p>
<p>If I wanted to run it under emulation (like my <a href="http://winnt31.superglobalmegacorp.com/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">NT 3.1 Apache server</a>), I would pick a far stronger host machine, than a P4 (or below).  The whole point of going native is to actually have the hardware in question.</p>
<p>Now if it offered peripheral passthru maybe, but really, if say I was passing thru a video card, and storage, what would I need qemu for?  Other than trying to restrict the CPU&#8230; but passthru seems to be far more of an art than a science.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: raijinzrael		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2016/10/26/installing-windows-nt-3-1-physical-computer/comment-page-1/#comment-174372</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[raijinzrael]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2016 06:38:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=6566#comment-174372</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://virtuallyfun.com/2016/10/26/installing-windows-nt-3-1-physical-computer/comment-page-1/#comment-174325&quot;&gt;Urs Pfister&lt;/a&gt;.

Yeah, is easy... But then where&#039;s the fun in trying to run the older OS baremetal? And that&#039;s without counting you are limited to the virtual hardware exposed by QEMU, so if you have some ISA hardware, or PCI cards you want to use in your configuration to run certain app or game you&#039;re out. Also QEMU has very poor support for Win9x/3x. Poor Cirrus Video emulation for Win3x and no DirectDraw/D3D/Glide for Win9x. Slow sound because QEMU doesn&#039;t like how 9x kernel handles hardware and CPU, and KVM can&#039;t accelerate it. Really no worth in running these old OSs emulated to actually do something... Specially if you already got a dedicated rig to run them (aka, you aren&#039;t using your work PC to test them).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2016/10/26/installing-windows-nt-3-1-physical-computer/comment-page-1/#comment-174325">Urs Pfister</a>.</p>
<p>Yeah, is easy&#8230; But then where&#8217;s the fun in trying to run the older OS baremetal? And that&#8217;s without counting you are limited to the virtual hardware exposed by QEMU, so if you have some ISA hardware, or PCI cards you want to use in your configuration to run certain app or game you&#8217;re out. Also QEMU has very poor support for Win9x/3x. Poor Cirrus Video emulation for Win3x and no DirectDraw/D3D/Glide for Win9x. Slow sound because QEMU doesn&#8217;t like how 9x kernel handles hardware and CPU, and KVM can&#8217;t accelerate it. Really no worth in running these old OSs emulated to actually do something&#8230; Specially if you already got a dedicated rig to run them (aka, you aren&#8217;t using your work PC to test them).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Urs Pfister		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2016/10/26/installing-windows-nt-3-1-physical-computer/comment-page-1/#comment-174325</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Urs Pfister]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2016 10:05:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=6566#comment-174325</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[For any older Windows machines, I recommend using ArchivistaMini with QEMU, it is much much easier to start machines.

Just setup the machine and do not forgot to disable kvm and acpi, and there you go:

http://archivista.ch/avmini.iso (distribution to do it)
http://archivista.ch/cms/language/en/news-blog/archivistabox-2016x

In this manner, I did run any Windows 9.x/NT machines for years without any problems.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For any older Windows machines, I recommend using ArchivistaMini with QEMU, it is much much easier to start machines.</p>
<p>Just setup the machine and do not forgot to disable kvm and acpi, and there you go:</p>
<p><a href="http://archivista.ch/avmini.iso" rel="nofollow ugc">http://archivista.ch/avmini.iso</a> (distribution to do it)<br />
<a href="http://archivista.ch/cms/language/en/news-blog/archivistabox-2016x" rel="nofollow ugc">http://archivista.ch/cms/language/en/news-blog/archivistabox-2016x</a></p>
<p>In this manner, I did run any Windows 9.x/NT machines for years without any problems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: A. Kohl		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2016/10/26/installing-windows-nt-3-1-physical-computer/comment-page-1/#comment-174132</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[A. Kohl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2016 21:44:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=6566#comment-174132</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It should be NT3.5 and below which use ATDISK.SYS. For 3.51 and higher you can try the UNI-ATA driver http://alter.org.ua/en/soft/win/uni_ata/ (it comes with sources).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It should be NT3.5 and below which use ATDISK.SYS. For 3.51 and higher you can try the UNI-ATA driver <a href="http://alter.org.ua/en/soft/win/uni_ata/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://alter.org.ua/en/soft/win/uni_ata/</a> (it comes with sources).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: raijinzrael		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2016/10/26/installing-windows-nt-3-1-physical-computer/comment-page-1/#comment-174129</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[raijinzrael]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2016 21:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=6566#comment-174129</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Still, to get speedier setups with NT3.1, you really want to use a SCSI card with proper NT3.1 drivers, and a SCSI disk. NT4 and less don&#039;t use ATAPI.sys/SCSIPORT.sys for IDE HDDs, but the unoptimized slow and CPU/interrupt intensive dog ATDISK.sys, a very basic ST506/WD100x driver which doesn&#039;t even know how to do proper MWDMA/UDMA transfers.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still, to get speedier setups with NT3.1, you really want to use a SCSI card with proper NT3.1 drivers, and a SCSI disk. NT4 and less don&#8217;t use ATAPI.sys/SCSIPORT.sys for IDE HDDs, but the unoptimized slow and CPU/interrupt intensive dog ATDISK.sys, a very basic ST506/WD100x driver which doesn&#8217;t even know how to do proper MWDMA/UDMA transfers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
