Comments on: As requested, PCem v11 with networking https://virtuallyfun.com/2016/06/11/as-requested-pcem-v11-with-networking/ Fun with Virtualization Sun, 25 Sep 2016 07:51:41 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0 By: neozeed https://virtuallyfun.com/2016/06/11/as-requested-pcem-v11-with-networking/comment-page-1/#comment-172572 Sun, 25 Sep 2016 07:51:41 +0000 https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=6244#comment-172572 In reply to iamadog.

I never tried the xt stuff with ne2000… but you will need to set a low irq

]]> By: iamadog https://virtuallyfun.com/2016/06/11/as-requested-pcem-v11-with-networking/comment-page-1/#comment-172568 Sun, 25 Sep 2016 05:04:35 +0000 https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=6244#comment-172568 Thanks for your network version. It is awesome!
just for report
IBM AT(286) + NE2000 Packet driver works very well.

IBM XT(8088) + NE2000 Packet driver doesn’t work.
IBM XT(8088) + 8-bit mod NE2000 Packet driver doesn’t work too.

loading packet driver shows message:
System: 8088/8086 process, ISA bus
Packet driver software interrupt is 0x60 (96)
I/O port 0x330 (816)
My Ethernet address is AC:DE:48:88:BB:AA

mTCP ping shows message:
Time out waiting for ARP response.

PS. about the 8-bit mod NE2000 packet driver :
http://www.vcfed.org/forum/showthread.php?41081-NE2000-Packet-drivers-for-8-bit-slots&highlight=ne2000

]]> By: Alex https://virtuallyfun.com/2016/06/11/as-requested-pcem-v11-with-networking/comment-page-1/#comment-168716 Sat, 02 Jul 2016 01:51:17 +0000 https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=6244#comment-168716 Neozeed, you are the man! Thanks for the network updated version!

]]> By: neozeed https://virtuallyfun.com/2016/06/11/as-requested-pcem-v11-with-networking/comment-page-1/#comment-168061 Tue, 14 Jun 2016 23:52:03 +0000 https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=6244#comment-168061 In reply to Peter.

I’ve already updated it, and added a note…

]]> By: Peter https://virtuallyfun.com/2016/06/11/as-requested-pcem-v11-with-networking/comment-page-1/#comment-168054 Tue, 14 Jun 2016 19:05:09 +0000 https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=6244#comment-168054 In reply to neozeed.

Yes, it solves the problem. Because I downloaded first the extended version of PCem, I had no comparison.
May be it will be a good idea to add the nvr subdir to the offered ZIP, or may be drop an additional note about it.

]]> By: neozeed https://virtuallyfun.com/2016/06/11/as-requested-pcem-v11-with-networking/comment-page-1/#comment-168012 Mon, 13 Jun 2016 19:39:45 +0000 https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=6244#comment-168012 In reply to tony.

Yep that’s it!

]]> By: neozeed https://virtuallyfun.com/2016/06/11/as-requested-pcem-v11-with-networking/comment-page-1/#comment-168011 Mon, 13 Jun 2016 19:39:11 +0000 https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=6244#comment-168011 In reply to Peter.

well the source has the exact same issue for me.

]]> By: tony https://virtuallyfun.com/2016/06/11/as-requested-pcem-v11-with-networking/comment-page-1/#comment-168010 Mon, 13 Jun 2016 19:24:56 +0000 https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=6244#comment-168010 One note for the BIOS error… do you guys have a nvr folder under your pcem folder? PCem doesn’t seems to create the folder by itself. I can save my changes without any problems.

]]> By: Peter https://virtuallyfun.com/2016/06/11/as-requested-pcem-v11-with-networking/comment-page-1/#comment-168007 Mon, 13 Jun 2016 18:49:16 +0000 https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=6244#comment-168007 In reply to o_O.

The (windows) binary I downloaded from http://pcem-emulator.co.uk/downloads.html does not have the problem.

]]> By: neozeed https://virtuallyfun.com/2016/06/11/as-requested-pcem-v11-with-networking/comment-page-1/#comment-168000 Mon, 13 Jun 2016 14:46:15 +0000 https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=6244#comment-168000 In reply to o_O.

I rebuilt from the stock source I downloaded, and it does the same thing.

]]>