<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: OpenBSD 5.9 released!	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2016/04/05/openbsd-5-9-released/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2016/04/05/openbsd-5-9-released/</link>
	<description>Fun with Virtualization</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2016 02:17:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: neozeed		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2016/04/05/openbsd-5-9-released/comment-page-1/#comment-164316</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neozeed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2016 02:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=6031#comment-164316</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://virtuallyfun.com/2016/04/05/openbsd-5-9-released/comment-page-1/#comment-164307&quot;&gt;Christian&lt;/a&gt;.

I guess as long as the build machines work, they will continue onwards.  RIP VAX.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2016/04/05/openbsd-5-9-released/comment-page-1/#comment-164307">Christian</a>.</p>
<p>I guess as long as the build machines work, they will continue onwards.  RIP VAX.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: neozeed		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2016/04/05/openbsd-5-9-released/comment-page-1/#comment-164315</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neozeed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2016 02:15:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=6031#comment-164315</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://virtuallyfun.com/2016/04/05/openbsd-5-9-released/comment-page-1/#comment-164303&quot;&gt;Noth&lt;/a&gt;.

Now that we live in the era of hardware backdoors, I guess in some ways, software crypto is really the way to go.  Not to mention when it comes to any kind of data recovery, software raid is always tops!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2016/04/05/openbsd-5-9-released/comment-page-1/#comment-164303">Noth</a>.</p>
<p>Now that we live in the era of hardware backdoors, I guess in some ways, software crypto is really the way to go.  Not to mention when it comes to any kind of data recovery, software raid is always tops!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: neozeed		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2016/04/05/openbsd-5-9-released/comment-page-1/#comment-164314</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neozeed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2016 02:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=6031#comment-164314</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://virtuallyfun.com/2016/04/05/openbsd-5-9-released/comment-page-1/#comment-164289&quot;&gt;calvin&lt;/a&gt;.

No kidding, the luna88k is not only a dead end platform, but a dead end processor.

Maybe Motorola could have fixed it, but then they got sidelined with that IBM deal.  Seems all IBM did in the 1990&#039;s was sideline great tech and destroy it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2016/04/05/openbsd-5-9-released/comment-page-1/#comment-164289">calvin</a>.</p>
<p>No kidding, the luna88k is not only a dead end platform, but a dead end processor.</p>
<p>Maybe Motorola could have fixed it, but then they got sidelined with that IBM deal.  Seems all IBM did in the 1990&#8217;s was sideline great tech and destroy it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Christian		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2016/04/05/openbsd-5-9-released/comment-page-1/#comment-164307</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Christian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2016 22:13:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=6031#comment-164307</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thanks for reminding me that my Zaurus SL-C3100 needs to be updated to 5.9 :) I hope OpenBSD&#039;s going to support these for a while to come, since there&#039;s no current Linux distribution which explicitly supports Zaurii anymore, at least to my knowledge. Then there&#039;s NetBSD/zaurus, still to be tried on my SL-C700 and C750...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for reminding me that my Zaurus SL-C3100 needs to be updated to 5.9 🙂 I hope OpenBSD&#8217;s going to support these for a while to come, since there&#8217;s no current Linux distribution which explicitly supports Zaurii anymore, at least to my knowledge. Then there&#8217;s NetBSD/zaurus, still to be tried on my SL-C700 and C750&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Noth		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2016/04/05/openbsd-5-9-released/comment-page-1/#comment-164303</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Noth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2016 21:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=6031#comment-164303</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[My Vaio Pro 11 can finally run OpenBSD (with softraid crypto no less) with this release, it&#039;s brilliant to use!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My Vaio Pro 11 can finally run OpenBSD (with softraid crypto no less) with this release, it&#8217;s brilliant to use!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: calvin		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2016/04/05/openbsd-5-9-released/comment-page-1/#comment-164289</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[calvin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2016 16:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=6031#comment-164289</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m slightly amazed luna88k, landisk, armish and socpcc are still holding on. To a lesser extent, sgi and zaurus.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m slightly amazed luna88k, landisk, armish and socpcc are still holding on. To a lesser extent, sgi and zaurus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
