<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Bringing back the WinZork demo via jsDOSBox	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2015/01/26/bringing-back-the-winzork-demo-via-jsdosbox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2015/01/26/bringing-back-the-winzork-demo-via-jsdosbox/</link>
	<description>Fun with Virtualization</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2015 12:44:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: neozeed		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2015/01/26/bringing-back-the-winzork-demo-via-jsdosbox/comment-page-1/#comment-131125</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neozeed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2015 12:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=4976#comment-131125</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://virtuallyfun.com/2015/01/26/bringing-back-the-winzork-demo-via-jsdosbox/comment-page-1/#comment-131117&quot;&gt;Kevin O&#039;Dwyer&lt;/a&gt;.

awesome, I&#039;ll be sure to check it out!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2015/01/26/bringing-back-the-winzork-demo-via-jsdosbox/comment-page-1/#comment-131117">Kevin O&#8217;Dwyer</a>.</p>
<p>awesome, I&#8217;ll be sure to check it out!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Kevin O'Dwyer		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2015/01/26/bringing-back-the-winzork-demo-via-jsdosbox/comment-page-1/#comment-131117</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin O'Dwyer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2015 10:39:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=4976#comment-131117</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[new jsdosbox release.  Adds better mouse control, and other graphic modes.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>new jsdosbox release.  Adds better mouse control, and other graphic modes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: kevin o'dwyer		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2015/01/26/bringing-back-the-winzork-demo-via-jsdosbox/comment-page-1/#comment-130577</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kevin o'dwyer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2015 20:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=4976#comment-130577</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://virtuallyfun.com/2015/01/26/bringing-back-the-winzork-demo-via-jsdosbox/comment-page-1/#comment-130543&quot;&gt;neozeed&lt;/a&gt;.

Networking would be great. Certainly doable, but beyond me i’m afraid.  At this point i think emdosbox is the superior option. It uses the emscripten dev chain, i still use GWT for jsdosbox (may change to another method). Js ES6 includes yield/generators which is an option for implementing threading. There is even a few neat VM implementations that run inside a Js VM providing threads.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2015/01/26/bringing-back-the-winzork-demo-via-jsdosbox/comment-page-1/#comment-130543">neozeed</a>.</p>
<p>Networking would be great. Certainly doable, but beyond me i’m afraid.  At this point i think emdosbox is the superior option. It uses the emscripten dev chain, i still use GWT for jsdosbox (may change to another method). Js ES6 includes yield/generators which is an option for implementing threading. There is even a few neat VM implementations that run inside a Js VM providing threads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Peter Godwin		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2015/01/26/bringing-back-the-winzork-demo-via-jsdosbox/comment-page-1/#comment-130544</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Godwin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2015 22:12:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=4976#comment-130544</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://virtuallyfun.com/2015/01/26/bringing-back-the-winzork-demo-via-jsdosbox/comment-page-1/#comment-130543&quot;&gt;neozeed&lt;/a&gt;.

Oh wow - that&#039;d be cool - modems over WebRTC!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2015/01/26/bringing-back-the-winzork-demo-via-jsdosbox/comment-page-1/#comment-130543">neozeed</a>.</p>
<p>Oh wow &#8211; that&#8217;d be cool &#8211; modems over WebRTC!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: neozeed		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2015/01/26/bringing-back-the-winzork-demo-via-jsdosbox/comment-page-1/#comment-130543</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neozeed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2015 21:40:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=4976#comment-130543</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://virtuallyfun.com/2015/01/26/bringing-back-the-winzork-demo-via-jsdosbox/comment-page-1/#comment-130537&quot;&gt;Kevin O&#039;Dwyer&lt;/a&gt;.

I havent dived under the hood of DOSBox, but I have tried to port Basilisk II, and had issues because of the threadding..  I cheated and manually called the thread periodically from within the main loop.  Of course for some reason SDL doesn&#039;t update anything in the video area, but I know the loop runs via some debug printing.

How do you debug emscripten stuff anyways?

Oh and features? Of course I want modems to work! ..  As much as I hate to be *that* user, but this would be the ultimate doom party thing.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2015/01/26/bringing-back-the-winzork-demo-via-jsdosbox/comment-page-1/#comment-130537">Kevin O&#8217;Dwyer</a>.</p>
<p>I havent dived under the hood of DOSBox, but I have tried to port Basilisk II, and had issues because of the threadding..  I cheated and manually called the thread periodically from within the main loop.  Of course for some reason SDL doesn&#8217;t update anything in the video area, but I know the loop runs via some debug printing.</p>
<p>How do you debug emscripten stuff anyways?</p>
<p>Oh and features? Of course I want modems to work! ..  As much as I hate to be *that* user, but this would be the ultimate doom party thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Kevin O'Dwyer		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2015/01/26/bringing-back-the-winzork-demo-via-jsdosbox/comment-page-1/#comment-130537</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin O'Dwyer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2015 18:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=4976#comment-130537</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Cool demo!  Sorry about the mouse control.  It is now the top priority for the february release. If you have any dev requests, please send them through.  The reason .bat files can’t be executed is connected to why boot hasn’t been implemented and it is related to the single-threaded world of js (and my lack of skill). As a workaround I am sure back in the day there was dos programs to compile .bat to .com.  I’m now inspired to see if i can run parts of https://code.google.com/p/nanox-microwindows-nxlib-fltk-for-dos/wiki/XFDOS. I am also working on a request to improve a demo of an emulator for an 8-bit microcomputer running inside this emulator.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool demo!  Sorry about the mouse control.  It is now the top priority for the february release. If you have any dev requests, please send them through.  The reason .bat files can’t be executed is connected to why boot hasn’t been implemented and it is related to the single-threaded world of js (and my lack of skill). As a workaround I am sure back in the day there was dos programs to compile .bat to .com.  I’m now inspired to see if i can run parts of <a href="https://code.google.com/p/nanox-microwindows-nxlib-fltk-for-dos/wiki/XFDOS" rel="nofollow ugc">https://code.google.com/p/nanox-microwindows-nxlib-fltk-for-dos/wiki/XFDOS</a>. I am also working on a request to improve a demo of an emulator for an 8-bit microcomputer running inside this emulator.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
