<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Just to let people know I&#8217;m still alive!	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2012/10/01/just-to-let-people-know-im-still-alive/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2012/10/01/just-to-let-people-know-im-still-alive/</link>
	<description>Fun with Virtualization</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 02:13:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Yuhong Bao		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2012/10/01/just-to-let-people-know-im-still-alive/comment-page-1/#comment-28500</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yuhong Bao]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 02:13:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=2348#comment-28500</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In fact, one of the tables in TrueType font files is still called &#039;OS/2&#039;!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In fact, one of the tables in TrueType font files is still called &#8216;OS/2&#8217;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Yuhong Bao		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2012/10/01/just-to-let-people-know-im-still-alive/comment-page-1/#comment-24142</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yuhong Bao]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 08:38:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=2348#comment-24142</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;I don’t know what it is interesting about that time period…&#039;
Yea, the most interesting thing about 32-bit OS/2 is how MS turned it into an entire fiasco. I could write an entire article about this one. In the meantime see my comments on os2museum blog for example.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I don’t know what it is interesting about that time period…&#8217;<br />
Yea, the most interesting thing about 32-bit OS/2 is how MS turned it into an entire fiasco. I could write an entire article about this one. In the meantime see my comments on os2museum blog for example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: neozeed		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2012/10/01/just-to-let-people-know-im-still-alive/comment-page-1/#comment-20914</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neozeed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 01:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=2348#comment-20914</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[ugh tired of my hosting getting DDos&#039;ed soooo here we are on a new host.  I&#039;ve got to transfer the rest of my crap.. so hang tight.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ugh tired of my hosting getting DDos&#8217;ed soooo here we are on a new host.  I&#8217;ve got to transfer the rest of my crap.. so hang tight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: neozeed		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2012/10/01/just-to-let-people-know-im-still-alive/comment-page-1/#comment-20847</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neozeed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 23:16:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=2348#comment-20847</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://virtuallyfun.com/2012/10/01/just-to-let-people-know-im-still-alive/comment-page-1/#comment-20838&quot;&gt;Michal Necasek&lt;/a&gt;.

yeah that is how I found it by accident!  It seems the deal was with Microsoft exclusively and it wasn&#039;t a simple plug&amp;play operation which is why it didn&#039;t make it until Windows 3.1 , and why IBM couldn&#039;t include it in OS/2 ...

I have to wonder if the MS OS/2 2.0 was going to have networking built in much like Windows for Workgroups or Windows 95, instead of being separate products slapped on as it was with OS/2 1.x and beyond.  Even the Extended Editions of OS/2 you still had to keep running various setups after installing the Base OS which just felt so... non integrated.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2012/10/01/just-to-let-people-know-im-still-alive/comment-page-1/#comment-20838">Michal Necasek</a>.</p>
<p>yeah that is how I found it by accident!  It seems the deal was with Microsoft exclusively and it wasn&#8217;t a simple plug&#038;play operation which is why it didn&#8217;t make it until Windows 3.1 , and why IBM couldn&#8217;t include it in OS/2 &#8230;</p>
<p>I have to wonder if the MS OS/2 2.0 was going to have networking built in much like Windows for Workgroups or Windows 95, instead of being separate products slapped on as it was with OS/2 1.x and beyond.  Even the Extended Editions of OS/2 you still had to keep running various setups after installing the Base OS which just felt so&#8230; non integrated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Michal Necasek		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2012/10/01/just-to-let-people-know-im-still-alive/comment-page-1/#comment-20838</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michal Necasek]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 21:05:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=2348#comment-20838</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[See mentions of &quot;Royal font&quot; technology back around 1989-1990. That&#039;s what TrueType was called during development.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See mentions of &#8220;Royal font&#8221; technology back around 1989-1990. That&#8217;s what TrueType was called during development.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
