<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Upgrading through Windows NT; Windows NT 3.51	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2012/03/31/upgrading-through-windows-nt-windows-nt-3-51/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2012/03/31/upgrading-through-windows-nt-windows-nt-3-51/</link>
	<description>Fun with Virtualization</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Feb 2025 14:12:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: neozeed		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2012/03/31/upgrading-through-windows-nt-windows-nt-3-51/comment-page-1/#comment-10947</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neozeed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 01:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=1942#comment-10947</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I should add that I&#039;ve installed NT 3.51 on Qemu 0.15.1 .. the &#039;trick&#039; is to hit f5/f6 at the NTDETECT portion and load the &#039;normal&#039; PC HAL. I&#039;ve installed all the way to 2000 this way, but once more again it crashes when upgrading to XP.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should add that I&#8217;ve installed NT 3.51 on Qemu 0.15.1 .. the &#8216;trick&#8217; is to hit f5/f6 at the NTDETECT portion and load the &#8216;normal&#8217; PC HAL. I&#8217;ve installed all the way to 2000 this way, but once more again it crashes when upgrading to XP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tony		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2012/03/31/upgrading-through-windows-nt-windows-nt-3-51/comment-page-1/#comment-10624</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tony]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 02:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=1942#comment-10624</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://virtuallyfun.com/2012/03/31/upgrading-through-windows-nt-windows-nt-3-51/comment-page-1/#comment-10549&quot;&gt;neozeed&lt;/a&gt;.

Really? I never knew there was huge change on ethernet part (besides the default card moved from NE2000 to RTL8139). One thing I don&#039;t understand was video became unusable for Win 3.x after QEMU 0.12, although in 0.12.3 it was listed as a fix...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2012/03/31/upgrading-through-windows-nt-windows-nt-3-51/comment-page-1/#comment-10549">neozeed</a>.</p>
<p>Really? I never knew there was huge change on ethernet part (besides the default card moved from NE2000 to RTL8139). One thing I don&#8217;t understand was video became unusable for Win 3.x after QEMU 0.12, although in 0.12.3 it was listed as a fix&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: neozeed		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2012/03/31/upgrading-through-windows-nt-windows-nt-3-51/comment-page-1/#comment-10587</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neozeed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 13:18:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=1942#comment-10587</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://virtuallyfun.com/2012/03/31/upgrading-through-windows-nt-windows-nt-3-51/comment-page-1/#comment-10573&quot;&gt;Raijinzrael&lt;/a&gt;.

The guy doing the RS/6000 emulation, Hervé is the same that made the MIPS runnable for NT so I&#039;m sure  its on his list after AIX...

Or one can hope.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2012/03/31/upgrading-through-windows-nt-windows-nt-3-51/comment-page-1/#comment-10573">Raijinzrael</a>.</p>
<p>The guy doing the RS/6000 emulation, Hervé is the same that made the MIPS runnable for NT so I&#8217;m sure  its on his list after AIX&#8230;</p>
<p>Or one can hope.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Raijinzrael		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2012/03/31/upgrading-through-windows-nt-windows-nt-3-51/comment-page-1/#comment-10573</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Raijinzrael]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 05:23:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=1942#comment-10573</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://virtuallyfun.com/2012/03/31/upgrading-through-windows-nt-windows-nt-3-51/comment-page-1/#comment-10511&quot;&gt;neozeed&lt;/a&gt;.

Lately I&#039;ve seen much work in the QEMU PReP emulation, the same one that PPC WinNT requires... Although their efforts are aimed to run unmodified old AIX versions on QEMU,  the PReP emulation is targeted to an RS6000 40p class machine, to firmware level... so maybe their work can be used with little modifications to run the ARC firmware required to run Windows NT in a foreseeable future.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2012/03/31/upgrading-through-windows-nt-windows-nt-3-51/comment-page-1/#comment-10511">neozeed</a>.</p>
<p>Lately I&#8217;ve seen much work in the QEMU PReP emulation, the same one that PPC WinNT requires&#8230; Although their efforts are aimed to run unmodified old AIX versions on QEMU,  the PReP emulation is targeted to an RS6000 40p class machine, to firmware level&#8230; so maybe their work can be used with little modifications to run the ARC firmware required to run Windows NT in a foreseeable future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: neozeed		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2012/03/31/upgrading-through-windows-nt-windows-nt-3-51/comment-page-1/#comment-10549</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neozeed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2012 20:52:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=1942#comment-10549</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://virtuallyfun.com/2012/03/31/upgrading-through-windows-nt-windows-nt-3-51/comment-page-1/#comment-10545&quot;&gt;Tony&lt;/a&gt;.

I mean to touch on this, I used 0.90 to do the upgrade, once its done 0.15.0 &amp; 1.0.1 run it fine, although the networking is all screwed up in 1.xx ... :(]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2012/03/31/upgrading-through-windows-nt-windows-nt-3-51/comment-page-1/#comment-10545">Tony</a>.</p>
<p>I mean to touch on this, I used 0.90 to do the upgrade, once its done 0.15.0 &#038; 1.0.1 run it fine, although the networking is all screwed up in 1.xx &#8230; 🙁</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tony		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2012/03/31/upgrading-through-windows-nt-windows-nt-3-51/comment-page-1/#comment-10545</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tony]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2012 20:28:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=1942#comment-10545</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Just wondering, what architecture do you use to run NT 3.51? I&#039;ve tried using both QEMU 0.9.1 and 1.0.1 w/ i386 and they both stuck at BSOD after I inserted the second boot floppy. I have tried changing ram from 8M to 32M and cpu from 486 to pentium but non works.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wondering, what architecture do you use to run NT 3.51? I&#8217;ve tried using both QEMU 0.9.1 and 1.0.1 w/ i386 and they both stuck at BSOD after I inserted the second boot floppy. I have tried changing ram from 8M to 32M and cpu from 486 to pentium but non works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: neozeed		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2012/03/31/upgrading-through-windows-nt-windows-nt-3-51/comment-page-1/#comment-10522</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neozeed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2012 14:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=1942#comment-10522</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://virtuallyfun.com/2012/03/31/upgrading-through-windows-nt-windows-nt-3-51/comment-page-1/#comment-10515&quot;&gt;Michal Necasek&lt;/a&gt;.

I used to run IIS on mine, and hosted it on the internet... It was all the joy of IIS, but without any of the x86 exploits...

I was trying to talk corporate into it, I think the ASP package made it to the PowerPC shortly before it was killed... Now as for the Alpha, I know people ran that for SQL for sure... I&#039;m not sure about IIS.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2012/03/31/upgrading-through-windows-nt-windows-nt-3-51/comment-page-1/#comment-10515">Michal Necasek</a>.</p>
<p>I used to run IIS on mine, and hosted it on the internet&#8230; It was all the joy of IIS, but without any of the x86 exploits&#8230;</p>
<p>I was trying to talk corporate into it, I think the ASP package made it to the PowerPC shortly before it was killed&#8230; Now as for the Alpha, I know people ran that for SQL for sure&#8230; I&#8217;m not sure about IIS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Michal Necasek		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2012/03/31/upgrading-through-windows-nt-windows-nt-3-51/comment-page-1/#comment-10515</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michal Necasek]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2012 13:27:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=1942#comment-10515</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://virtuallyfun.com/2012/03/31/upgrading-through-windows-nt-windows-nt-3-51/comment-page-1/#comment-10511&quot;&gt;neozeed&lt;/a&gt;.

I saw NT (4.0) running on IBM Power Series 440/830 as well as on a RS/6000 (43p). It never got past the stage of being a curiosity, as in comparison the Alpha version of NT had a vast library of apps available.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2012/03/31/upgrading-through-windows-nt-windows-nt-3-51/comment-page-1/#comment-10511">neozeed</a>.</p>
<p>I saw NT (4.0) running on IBM Power Series 440/830 as well as on a RS/6000 (43p). It never got past the stage of being a curiosity, as in comparison the Alpha version of NT had a vast library of apps available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: neozeed		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2012/03/31/upgrading-through-windows-nt-windows-nt-3-51/comment-page-1/#comment-10511</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neozeed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2012 13:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=1942#comment-10511</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://virtuallyfun.com/2012/03/31/upgrading-through-windows-nt-windows-nt-3-51/comment-page-1/#comment-10498&quot;&gt;Gert-Jan C. Lokhorst&lt;/a&gt;.

I&#039;ve run the PowerPC version of NT (3.51 and 4.0) on a real PowerPC, and IBM RS/6000 40p to be exact.  Sadly the Qemu emulation isn&#039;t there yet to run all the way through the BIOS let alone booting NT...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2012/03/31/upgrading-through-windows-nt-windows-nt-3-51/comment-page-1/#comment-10498">Gert-Jan C. Lokhorst</a>.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve run the PowerPC version of NT (3.51 and 4.0) on a real PowerPC, and IBM RS/6000 40p to be exact.  Sadly the Qemu emulation isn&#8217;t there yet to run all the way through the BIOS let alone booting NT&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Gert-Jan C. Lokhorst		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2012/03/31/upgrading-through-windows-nt-windows-nt-3-51/comment-page-1/#comment-10498</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gert-Jan C. Lokhorst]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2012 08:40:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=1942#comment-10498</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[You write: Windows NT 3.51 was significant in adding support for the PowerPC processor from IBM. I wonder: have you succeeded in running the PowerPC port of Windows NT 3.51 under qemu-system-ppc.exe?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You write: Windows NT 3.51 was significant in adding support for the PowerPC processor from IBM. I wonder: have you succeeded in running the PowerPC port of Windows NT 3.51 under qemu-system-ppc.exe?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
