<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: BBS is back online&#8230; again!	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2012/02/12/bbs-is-back-online-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2012/02/12/bbs-is-back-online-again/</link>
	<description>Fun with Virtualization</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2012 23:27:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: neozeed		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2012/02/12/bbs-is-back-online-again/comment-page-1/#comment-15557</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neozeed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2012 23:27:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=1704#comment-15557</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://virtuallyfun.com/2012/02/12/bbs-is-back-online-again/comment-page-1/#comment-15555&quot;&gt;mewse&lt;/a&gt;.

NT 4.0 is a great OS, I love the terminal server edition myself.  I know it can be a bit daunting setting this stuff up, but once its working its great!

Also keep in mind that bochs interprets 80386 instructions while Qemu does dynamic translation making it much faster...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2012/02/12/bbs-is-back-online-again/comment-page-1/#comment-15555">mewse</a>.</p>
<p>NT 4.0 is a great OS, I love the terminal server edition myself.  I know it can be a bit daunting setting this stuff up, but once its working its great!</p>
<p>Also keep in mind that bochs interprets 80386 instructions while Qemu does dynamic translation making it much faster&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: mewse		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2012/02/12/bbs-is-back-online-again/comment-page-1/#comment-15555</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mewse]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2012 21:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=1704#comment-15555</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://virtuallyfun.com/2012/02/12/bbs-is-back-online-again/comment-page-1/#comment-15534&quot;&gt;neozeed&lt;/a&gt;.

I haven&#039;t really gotten that far.

I had read your posts about setting up a board on OS/2 with SIO/vmodem, it all sounded pretty ideal but I&#039;ve never used OS/2 so the experience and nostalgia weren&#039;t there for me.

I ended up using NT4 for the modest resource requirements (it&#039;s around win95 era except stable..), bochs is really rough around the edges so it&#039;s running a 500MB flat image file for the hard drive.

Renegade is the BBS software (purely for nostalgia, I&#039;m fairly sure it&#039;s terrible software) and net2bbs/netfoss for the telnet solution.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2012/02/12/bbs-is-back-online-again/comment-page-1/#comment-15534">neozeed</a>.</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t really gotten that far.</p>
<p>I had read your posts about setting up a board on OS/2 with SIO/vmodem, it all sounded pretty ideal but I&#8217;ve never used OS/2 so the experience and nostalgia weren&#8217;t there for me.</p>
<p>I ended up using NT4 for the modest resource requirements (it&#8217;s around win95 era except stable..), bochs is really rough around the edges so it&#8217;s running a 500MB flat image file for the hard drive.</p>
<p>Renegade is the BBS software (purely for nostalgia, I&#8217;m fairly sure it&#8217;s terrible software) and net2bbs/netfoss for the telnet solution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: neozeed		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2012/02/12/bbs-is-back-online-again/comment-page-1/#comment-15534</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neozeed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2012 07:06:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=1704#comment-15534</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://virtuallyfun.com/2012/02/12/bbs-is-back-online-again/comment-page-1/#comment-15516&quot;&gt;mewse&lt;/a&gt;.

Glad you got it working! what is your setup? what kind of door? networks? lol]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2012/02/12/bbs-is-back-online-again/comment-page-1/#comment-15516">mewse</a>.</p>
<p>Glad you got it working! what is your setup? what kind of door? networks? lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: mewse		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2012/02/12/bbs-is-back-online-again/comment-page-1/#comment-15516</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mewse]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2012 21:50:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=1704#comment-15516</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://virtuallyfun.com/2012/02/12/bbs-is-back-online-again/comment-page-1/#comment-15513&quot;&gt;neozeed&lt;/a&gt;.

Yeah it&#039;s a cheap VPS and I don&#039;t know if I could screw around with modules to get NAT set up.

I found the solution tho! I decided to look at the slirp documentation rather than bochs, and one of the first things I read was that slirp firewalls the &quot;guest&quot;, which explains why I wasn&#039;t able to communicate with the VM from outside.

HOWEVER, I was able to put this single line in ~/.slirprc :

redir tcp 5023 to 23

That&#039;s all it needs for port 5023 of the VPS to be redirected to the telnet port of the VM. Easy :)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2012/02/12/bbs-is-back-online-again/comment-page-1/#comment-15513">neozeed</a>.</p>
<p>Yeah it&#8217;s a cheap VPS and I don&#8217;t know if I could screw around with modules to get NAT set up.</p>
<p>I found the solution tho! I decided to look at the slirp documentation rather than bochs, and one of the first things I read was that slirp firewalls the &#8220;guest&#8221;, which explains why I wasn&#8217;t able to communicate with the VM from outside.</p>
<p>HOWEVER, I was able to put this single line in ~/.slirprc :</p>
<p>redir tcp 5023 to 23</p>
<p>That&#8217;s all it needs for port 5023 of the VPS to be redirected to the telnet port of the VM. Easy 🙂</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: neozeed		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2012/02/12/bbs-is-back-online-again/comment-page-1/#comment-15513</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neozeed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2012 20:04:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=1704#comment-15513</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://virtuallyfun.com/2012/02/12/bbs-is-back-online-again/comment-page-1/#comment-15509&quot;&gt;mewse&lt;/a&gt;.

Can you put a &#039;secondary&#039; ip address on the loopback adapter?  or install a second one (with a non 127.0.0.1 address)..?  If you can, then you just NAT it from within the VM...  Sadly the cheaper hosting stuff won&#039;t let you do anything that &#039;creative&#039;, esp altering routing ....

I launch my qemu under screen, and use cpulimit to make sure it never runs at 100% CPU ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2012/02/12/bbs-is-back-online-again/comment-page-1/#comment-15509">mewse</a>.</p>
<p>Can you put a &#8216;secondary&#8217; ip address on the loopback adapter?  or install a second one (with a non 127.0.0.1 address)..?  If you can, then you just NAT it from within the VM&#8230;  Sadly the cheaper hosting stuff won&#8217;t let you do anything that &#8216;creative&#8217;, esp altering routing &#8230;.</p>
<p>I launch my qemu under screen, and use cpulimit to make sure it never runs at 100% CPU &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: mewse		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2012/02/12/bbs-is-back-online-again/comment-page-1/#comment-15509</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mewse]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2012 17:19:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=1704#comment-15509</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi neozeed, how did you route port 23 to the qemu instance? I&#039;m trying to achieve something similar but I&#039;m using bochs rather than qemu because I can throttle the CPU usage way down, however networking with slirp seems to mean I can&#039;t route any incoming requests from the VPS to the bochs VM.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi neozeed, how did you route port 23 to the qemu instance? I&#8217;m trying to achieve something similar but I&#8217;m using bochs rather than qemu because I can throttle the CPU usage way down, however networking with slirp seems to mean I can&#8217;t route any incoming requests from the VPS to the bochs VM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
