Comments on: Qemu 1.0 binaries for Windows (Win32) https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/12/09/qemu-1-0-binaries-for-windows-win32/ Fun with Virtualization Tue, 15 May 2012 07:53:30 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.1 By: jumpjack https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/12/09/qemu-1-0-binaries-for-windows-win32/comment-page-1/#comment-12510 Tue, 15 May 2012 07:53:30 +0000 https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=1627#comment-12510 In reply to neozeed.

Can you please provide more details or a link?

]]> By: neozeed https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/12/09/qemu-1-0-binaries-for-windows-win32/comment-page-1/#comment-12501 Tue, 15 May 2012 00:34:15 +0000 https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=1627#comment-12501 In reply to jumpjack.

I either use a fileserver that both can map to, or a web server/webdav …

I would suppose the guest should be able to mount host shares, either via 10.0.2.2 or the real ip address of the host…

]]> By: jumpjack https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/12/09/qemu-1-0-binaries-for-windows-win32/comment-page-1/#comment-12475 Mon, 14 May 2012 06:51:50 +0000 https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=1627#comment-12475 Is it possibile to share files between WinXP guest and WinXP host without being administrator on the host? I tried several guides with no luck.

]]> By: rainbow https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/12/09/qemu-1-0-binaries-for-windows-win32/comment-page-1/#comment-12423 Sat, 12 May 2012 20:36:16 +0000 https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=1627#comment-12423 In reply to neozeed.

I knew it. If I can’t get help here. I’ll try to get help at the MSFN forums for sure. 🙂

]]> By: neozeed https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/12/09/qemu-1-0-binaries-for-windows-win32/comment-page-1/#comment-12422 Sat, 12 May 2012 20:26:12 +0000 https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=1627#comment-12422 In reply to rainbow.

Qemu 1.0.1’s NAT doesn’t work… so its kind of pointless…

]]> By: rainbow https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/12/09/qemu-1-0-binaries-for-windows-win32/comment-page-1/#comment-12421 Sat, 12 May 2012 19:46:24 +0000 https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=1627#comment-12421 In reply to neozeed.

Thanks for the link and I’m awfully sorry for the late reply. You might want to do this when I update to Qemu 1.0.1.

]]> By: neozeed https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/12/09/qemu-1-0-binaries-for-windows-win32/comment-page-1/#comment-6757 Wed, 25 Jan 2012 13:06:04 +0000 https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=1627#comment-6757 In reply to jumpjack.

its in my download site vpsland.superglobalmegacorp.com/install … 1.0 ought to ‘just work’ but yeah building it is… complicated.

]]> By: jumpjack https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/12/09/qemu-1-0-binaries-for-windows-win32/comment-page-1/#comment-6708 Tue, 24 Jan 2012 17:26:01 +0000 https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=1627#comment-6708 Where could I find 0.14 for Win32, or how to get 1.0 working on Win32?

]]> By: neozeed https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/12/09/qemu-1-0-binaries-for-windows-win32/comment-page-1/#comment-6561 Fri, 20 Jan 2012 05:57:35 +0000 https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=1627#comment-6561 In reply to cnxsoft.

It’s scattered on the blog, but qemu now has a rather involved build process, along with the chicken/egg problem with glib. I’d recommend the older 0.14 or 0.15 in the interim to see how they fare.

]]> By: neozeed https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/12/09/qemu-1-0-binaries-for-windows-win32/comment-page-1/#comment-6560 Fri, 20 Jan 2012 05:56:19 +0000 https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=1627#comment-6560 In reply to John.

I’m on the road at the moment so I can’t do much in the way of testing…. If anything i’d recommend Qemu 0.15 or 0.14 … There is something that is VERY unstable with 1.0, first I thought it could be me, but someone else provided exe’s for win32, and they are just as problematic…

]]>