<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Windows 3.0 &#8230;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/06/01/windows-3-0/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/06/01/windows-3-0/</link>
	<description>Fun with Virtualization</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2017 08:00:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Will M		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/06/01/windows-3-0/comment-page-1/#comment-171317</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Will M]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2016 08:18:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=818#comment-171317</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Ah good old Windows 3.0.

My first exposure was in high school, where the 386s were actually more or less terminals (no HDD!) booting Windows off a central server, over a BNC network. Logins could take 5 minutes! We used to disconnect the machines off the network and run games off a bootdisk.

16MB on a 286 would be unheard of! Even at the start of the Pentium era, 16MB was for &#039;power users&#039; as 16GB was in 2010.

Microsoft saw that Access Links 386 wouldn&#039;t run properly on Windows, users would need to dip out into proper DOS. They probably thought that a lot of those who would want a golf game would be business users, they ended up buying Access and porting Links to Microsoft Golf. Version 2.0 runs under Windows 3.1x, installs it&#039;s own Win32 runtime and is a pain to try and get running under Virtualisation - it is pernickity about screen drivers (glfmod20.exe errors!), virtual memory and on VirtualBox runs too quickly (the swing meter seemed to be tied to the clock speed of the machine, running a VM on a modern processor is way too quick!). I remember running it on a 486, it was billed as &#039;photo realistic&#039; - the slow draw speed between swings took a few minutes.

A big DOS app I remember at the time was DBase, my uncle used to run it, it was happy being launched as a DOS session from an icon/PIF from Program Manager.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah good old Windows 3.0.</p>
<p>My first exposure was in high school, where the 386s were actually more or less terminals (no HDD!) booting Windows off a central server, over a BNC network. Logins could take 5 minutes! We used to disconnect the machines off the network and run games off a bootdisk.</p>
<p>16MB on a 286 would be unheard of! Even at the start of the Pentium era, 16MB was for &#8216;power users&#8217; as 16GB was in 2010.</p>
<p>Microsoft saw that Access Links 386 wouldn&#8217;t run properly on Windows, users would need to dip out into proper DOS. They probably thought that a lot of those who would want a golf game would be business users, they ended up buying Access and porting Links to Microsoft Golf. Version 2.0 runs under Windows 3.1x, installs it&#8217;s own Win32 runtime and is a pain to try and get running under Virtualisation &#8211; it is pernickity about screen drivers (glfmod20.exe errors!), virtual memory and on VirtualBox runs too quickly (the swing meter seemed to be tied to the clock speed of the machine, running a VM on a modern processor is way too quick!). I remember running it on a 486, it was billed as &#8216;photo realistic&#8217; &#8211; the slow draw speed between swings took a few minutes.</p>
<p>A big DOS app I remember at the time was DBase, my uncle used to run it, it was happy being launched as a DOS session from an icon/PIF from Program Manager.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: neozeed		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/06/01/windows-3-0/comment-page-1/#comment-32429</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neozeed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2013 16:46:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=818#comment-32429</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I found it on cd.textfiles.com somewhere ... as a demonstration of Windows 3.0 in two parts... Like this for powerpoint part &lt;a href=&quot;http://cd.textfiles.com/cica9207/WIN3/DEMO/PPDEMO1.ZIP http://cd.textfiles.com/cica9207/WIN3/DEMO/PPDEMO1.ZIP&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;one&lt;/a&gt; &amp; &lt;a href=&quot;http://cd.textfiles.com/cica9207/WIN3/DEMO/PPDEMO1.ZIP http://cd.textfiles.com/cica9207/WIN3/DEMO/PPDEMO2.ZIP&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;two&lt;/a&gt;.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found it on cd.textfiles.com somewhere &#8230; as a demonstration of Windows 3.0 in two parts&#8230; Like this for powerpoint part <a href="http://cd.textfiles.com/cica9207/WIN3/DEMO/PPDEMO1.ZIP http://cd.textfiles.com/cica9207/WIN3/DEMO/PPDEMO1.ZIP" rel="nofollow">one</a> &#038; <a href="http://cd.textfiles.com/cica9207/WIN3/DEMO/PPDEMO1.ZIP http://cd.textfiles.com/cica9207/WIN3/DEMO/PPDEMO2.ZIP" rel="nofollow">two</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: TheDoctor		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/06/01/windows-3-0/comment-page-1/#comment-32428</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TheDoctor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2013 16:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=818#comment-32428</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Where did you get that Windows Demonstration?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where did you get that Windows Demonstration?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Yuhong Bao		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/06/01/windows-3-0/comment-page-1/#comment-12356</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yuhong Bao]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 08:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=818#comment-12356</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/06/01/windows-3-0/comment-page-1/#comment-2430&quot;&gt;neozeed&lt;/a&gt;.

I was thinking of the lawsuits. Win95 depending on DOS for booting helped Caldera drag the lawsuits for years. And DR-DOS 5.0 was released back in 1990!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/06/01/windows-3-0/comment-page-1/#comment-2430">neozeed</a>.</p>
<p>I was thinking of the lawsuits. Win95 depending on DOS for booting helped Caldera drag the lawsuits for years. And DR-DOS 5.0 was released back in 1990!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: neozeed		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/06/01/windows-3-0/comment-page-1/#comment-5593</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neozeed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 16:23:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=818#comment-5593</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/06/01/windows-3-0/comment-page-1/#comment-5574&quot;&gt;Yuhong Bao&lt;/a&gt;.

interesting it comes with windows 1.03 .... I guess it really was going to be OS/2 before there was an OS/2...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/06/01/windows-3-0/comment-page-1/#comment-5574">Yuhong Bao</a>.</p>
<p>interesting it comes with windows 1.03 &#8230;. I guess it really was going to be OS/2 before there was an OS/2&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Yuhong Bao		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/06/01/windows-3-0/comment-page-1/#comment-5574</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yuhong Bao]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 03:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=818#comment-5574</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/06/01/windows-3-0/comment-page-1/#comment-871&quot;&gt;neozeed&lt;/a&gt;.

Here is one copy that existed, sadly the site is now dead
http://web.archive.org/web/20070403074023/http://www.16bitos.com/410ms.htm]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/06/01/windows-3-0/comment-page-1/#comment-871">neozeed</a>.</p>
<p>Here is one copy that existed, sadly the site is now dead<br />
<a href="http://web.archive.org/web/20070403074023/http://www.16bitos.com/410ms.htm" rel="nofollow ugc">http://web.archive.org/web/20070403074023/http://www.16bitos.com/410ms.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Yuhong Bao		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/06/01/windows-3-0/comment-page-1/#comment-2444</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yuhong Bao]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2011 22:36:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=818#comment-2444</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/06/01/windows-3-0/comment-page-1/#comment-2435&quot;&gt;neozeed&lt;/a&gt;.

FYI, the main problem with 1.x is that even 1.3 still had many problems, like printer driver support.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/06/01/windows-3-0/comment-page-1/#comment-2435">neozeed</a>.</p>
<p>FYI, the main problem with 1.x is that even 1.3 still had many problems, like printer driver support.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Yuhong Bao		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/06/01/windows-3-0/comment-page-1/#comment-2443</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yuhong Bao]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2011 22:24:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=818#comment-2443</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/06/01/windows-3-0/comment-page-1/#comment-2435&quot;&gt;neozeed&lt;/a&gt;.

And Larry Osterman&#039;s blog says that multitasking DOS was one of the first DOSes to be developed on spec. It was only after it started development that European OEMs began to ask for it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/06/01/windows-3-0/comment-page-1/#comment-2435">neozeed</a>.</p>
<p>And Larry Osterman&#8217;s blog says that multitasking DOS was one of the first DOSes to be developed on spec. It was only after it started development that European OEMs began to ask for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Yuhong Bao		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/06/01/windows-3-0/comment-page-1/#comment-2442</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yuhong Bao]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2011 22:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=818#comment-2442</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/06/01/windows-3-0/comment-page-1/#comment-2430&quot;&gt;neozeed&lt;/a&gt;.

Yes the key market for DR-DOS was OEMs and even MS knew that. In fact they did not retail MS-DOS until MS-DOS 5.0 was released in 1991.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/06/01/windows-3-0/comment-page-1/#comment-2430">neozeed</a>.</p>
<p>Yes the key market for DR-DOS was OEMs and even MS knew that. In fact they did not retail MS-DOS until MS-DOS 5.0 was released in 1991.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Yuhong Bao		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/06/01/windows-3-0/comment-page-1/#comment-2441</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yuhong Bao]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2011 22:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=818#comment-2441</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/06/01/windows-3-0/comment-page-1/#comment-2435&quot;&gt;neozeed&lt;/a&gt;.

But also remember the 286 was already announced in early 1983.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/06/01/windows-3-0/comment-page-1/#comment-2435">neozeed</a>.</p>
<p>But also remember the 286 was already announced in early 1983.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
