<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: OS/2 and virtual COM ports.	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/05/15/os2-and-virtual-com-ports/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/05/15/os2-and-virtual-com-ports/</link>
	<description>Fun with Virtualization</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2018 22:59:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: neozeed		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/05/15/os2-and-virtual-com-ports/comment-page-1/#comment-201514</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neozeed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2018 22:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=534#comment-201514</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/05/15/os2-and-virtual-com-ports/comment-page-1/#comment-201507&quot;&gt;iCEx&lt;/a&gt;.

I belive I just made the init &#039;ATZ&#039; since there really isn&#039;t a modem to init anyways, and emulation is pretty basic.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/05/15/os2-and-virtual-com-ports/comment-page-1/#comment-201507">iCEx</a>.</p>
<p>I belive I just made the init &#8216;ATZ&#8217; since there really isn&#8217;t a modem to init anyways, and emulation is pretty basic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: iCEx		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/05/15/os2-and-virtual-com-ports/comment-page-1/#comment-201507</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[iCEx]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2018 17:24:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=534#comment-201507</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/05/15/os2-and-virtual-com-ports/comment-page-1/#comment-185597&quot;&gt;Zero&lt;/a&gt;.

How did you get past the PCBModem configurations? Every time I try to setup my modem, regardless of how I do it, I end up getting errors on AT&#038;FE1.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/05/15/os2-and-virtual-com-ports/comment-page-1/#comment-185597">Zero</a>.</p>
<p>How did you get past the PCBModem configurations? Every time I try to setup my modem, regardless of how I do it, I end up getting errors on AT&amp;FE1.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: neozeed		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/05/15/os2-and-virtual-com-ports/comment-page-1/#comment-185612</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neozeed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2017 14:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=534#comment-185612</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/05/15/os2-and-virtual-com-ports/comment-page-1/#comment-185608&quot;&gt;Zero&lt;/a&gt;.

I don&#039;t kow what it is, I just went through and tried every option and found this by accident.  I guess I should update it to virtualbox + vmware.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/05/15/os2-and-virtual-com-ports/comment-page-1/#comment-185608">Zero</a>.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t kow what it is, I just went through and tried every option and found this by accident.  I guess I should update it to virtualbox + vmware.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Zero		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/05/15/os2-and-virtual-com-ports/comment-page-1/#comment-185608</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zero]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2017 13:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=534#comment-185608</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/05/15/os2-and-virtual-com-ports/comment-page-1/#comment-185598&quot;&gt;neozeed&lt;/a&gt;.

Oh wow, yeah that was the same issue for me as well. I changed the &quot;PermaNet server&quot; to TRUE and boom... I can ping the rest of my network. Amazing!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/05/15/os2-and-virtual-com-ports/comment-page-1/#comment-185598">neozeed</a>.</p>
<p>Oh wow, yeah that was the same issue for me as well. I changed the &#8220;PermaNet server&#8221; to TRUE and boom&#8230; I can ping the rest of my network. Amazing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: neozeed		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/05/15/os2-and-virtual-com-ports/comment-page-1/#comment-185598</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neozeed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2017 04:55:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=534#comment-185598</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/05/15/os2-and-virtual-com-ports/comment-page-1/#comment-185597&quot;&gt;Zero&lt;/a&gt;.

I think there may be some unoffical update to 2.1 that didn&#039;t get a version bump, but added some better PCI support... I went through some serious hell to get OS/2 to work on VMWare ESXi, and it ended up being the intel network driver had to be configured incorrectly for it to work.

&lt;a href=&quot;https://virtuallyfun.superglobalmegacorp.com/2014/05/25/os2-2-0-on-vmware-player/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;That adventure was way back here&lt;/a&gt;.

Good to see that 1.6 is working for you as well, it seemed to be the best of the lot.  It&#039;s too bad I didn&#039;t know about vmodem functionality otherwise I&#039;d have registered SIO a long long time ago, but I only found out after playing with OS/2 BBS in a QEMU VM on a VPS... Ray Guinn either passed or disappeared from the world.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/05/15/os2-and-virtual-com-ports/comment-page-1/#comment-185597">Zero</a>.</p>
<p>I think there may be some unoffical update to 2.1 that didn&#8217;t get a version bump, but added some better PCI support&#8230; I went through some serious hell to get OS/2 to work on VMWare ESXi, and it ended up being the intel network driver had to be configured incorrectly for it to work.</p>
<p><a href="https://virtuallyfun.superglobalmegacorp.com/2014/05/25/os2-2-0-on-vmware-player/" target="_blank">That adventure was way back here</a>.</p>
<p>Good to see that 1.6 is working for you as well, it seemed to be the best of the lot.  It&#8217;s too bad I didn&#8217;t know about vmodem functionality otherwise I&#8217;d have registered SIO a long long time ago, but I only found out after playing with OS/2 BBS in a QEMU VM on a VPS&#8230; Ray Guinn either passed or disappeared from the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Zero		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/05/15/os2-and-virtual-com-ports/comment-page-1/#comment-185597</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zero]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2017 04:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=534#comment-185597</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/05/15/os2-and-virtual-com-ports/comment-page-1/#comment-185565&quot;&gt;neozeed&lt;/a&gt;.

Well, I installed OS/2 2.1 and ran the updates, installed TCP/IP, plus the updates, located a device driver for VirtualBox&#039;s emulated NICs, and everything was rocking along perfectly until it came to the TCP/IP config and despite spending all the evening fooling with it, I could not make it ping any of the other machines on my network.

So, with that failure, on a whim I tried your SIO 1.6 drivers in Warp 4. Bingo! PCBoard isn&#039;t lagging anymore, user input is as smooth as my Mystic setup on the Raspberry Pi, everything is silky smooth!

I&#039;m glad that&#039;s worked out, but now I really want to figure out why 2.1&#039;s networking was being such a pain. It is a lean, stripped down OS and I&#039;d love to make it function properly!

Thanks again for your help and the links! This has been a lot of fun.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/05/15/os2-and-virtual-com-ports/comment-page-1/#comment-185565">neozeed</a>.</p>
<p>Well, I installed OS/2 2.1 and ran the updates, installed TCP/IP, plus the updates, located a device driver for VirtualBox&#8217;s emulated NICs, and everything was rocking along perfectly until it came to the TCP/IP config and despite spending all the evening fooling with it, I could not make it ping any of the other machines on my network.</p>
<p>So, with that failure, on a whim I tried your SIO 1.6 drivers in Warp 4. Bingo! PCBoard isn&#8217;t lagging anymore, user input is as smooth as my Mystic setup on the Raspberry Pi, everything is silky smooth!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad that&#8217;s worked out, but now I really want to figure out why 2.1&#8217;s networking was being such a pain. It is a lean, stripped down OS and I&#8217;d love to make it function properly!</p>
<p>Thanks again for your help and the links! This has been a lot of fun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Zero		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/05/15/os2-and-virtual-com-ports/comment-page-1/#comment-185577</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zero]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2017 16:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=534#comment-185577</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/05/15/os2-and-virtual-com-ports/comment-page-1/#comment-185565&quot;&gt;neozeed&lt;/a&gt;.

This is very helpful! Thanks so much. I&#039;m going to take a crack at it!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/05/15/os2-and-virtual-com-ports/comment-page-1/#comment-185565">neozeed</a>.</p>
<p>This is very helpful! Thanks so much. I&#8217;m going to take a crack at it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: neozeed		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/05/15/os2-and-virtual-com-ports/comment-page-1/#comment-185565</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neozeed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2017 05:26:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=534#comment-185565</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/05/15/os2-and-virtual-com-ports/comment-page-1/#comment-185562&quot;&gt;Zero&lt;/a&gt;.

I&#039;m using SIO 1.6d, and I&#039;ve put links all on &lt;a href=&quot;http://bbs.superglobalmegacorp.com/os2.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;bbs.superglobalmegacorp.com&lt;/a&gt;.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/05/15/os2-and-virtual-com-ports/comment-page-1/#comment-185562">Zero</a>.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m using SIO 1.6d, and I&#8217;ve put links all on <a href="http://bbs.superglobalmegacorp.com/os2.html" rel="nofollow">bbs.superglobalmegacorp.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Zero		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/05/15/os2-and-virtual-com-ports/comment-page-1/#comment-185562</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zero]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2017 04:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=534#comment-185562</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/05/15/os2-and-virtual-com-ports/comment-page-1/#comment-185561&quot;&gt;neozeed&lt;/a&gt;.

Oh man, thanks for that info. That&#039;s valuable to know. I may try rolling back some versions to see what happens. I tried to fire up Warp 4 in QEMU and it started to launch, but ultimately crashed. Ack! I see what you mean!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/05/15/os2-and-virtual-com-ports/comment-page-1/#comment-185561">neozeed</a>.</p>
<p>Oh man, thanks for that info. That&#8217;s valuable to know. I may try rolling back some versions to see what happens. I tried to fire up Warp 4 in QEMU and it started to launch, but ultimately crashed. Ack! I see what you mean!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: neozeed		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/05/15/os2-and-virtual-com-ports/comment-page-1/#comment-185561</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neozeed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2017 03:50:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=534#comment-185561</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/05/15/os2-and-virtual-com-ports/comment-page-1/#comment-185559&quot;&gt;Zero&lt;/a&gt;.

I&#039;m using QEMU, and a much older version of SIO.  I am 100% unsure if newer is going to be better though.  I had issues with the newer versions of OS/2 being really laggy and considering the only thing I needed OS/2 for was to run MS-DOS stuff, so 2.00 was good enough for me.

That said, I&#039;m using Qemu version 0.15.1  I have found the newer versions of Qemu aren&#039;t quite as adept at emulating OS/2, and the fixes for going from GCC 3 to GCC 4 killed a lot of compatibility, just as going from GCC 4 to 5 killed an incredible amount of speed.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/05/15/os2-and-virtual-com-ports/comment-page-1/#comment-185559">Zero</a>.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m using QEMU, and a much older version of SIO.  I am 100% unsure if newer is going to be better though.  I had issues with the newer versions of OS/2 being really laggy and considering the only thing I needed OS/2 for was to run MS-DOS stuff, so 2.00 was good enough for me.</p>
<p>That said, I&#8217;m using Qemu version 0.15.1  I have found the newer versions of Qemu aren&#8217;t quite as adept at emulating OS/2, and the fixes for going from GCC 3 to GCC 4 killed a lot of compatibility, just as going from GCC 4 to 5 killed an incredible amount of speed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
