<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Office 4.2 for Windows NT	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/04/03/office-4-2-for-windows-nt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/04/03/office-4-2-for-windows-nt/</link>
	<description>Fun with Virtualization</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 May 2023 10:42:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: neozeed		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/04/03/office-4-2-for-windows-nt/comment-page-1/#comment-330769</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neozeed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2023 10:42:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=408#comment-330769</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/04/03/office-4-2-for-windows-nt/comment-page-1/#comment-256181&quot;&gt;Beluga&lt;/a&gt;.

Ironically &lt;a href=&quot;https://web.archive.org/web/20200919225216/https://www.ebay.com/p/1924517573?iid=372750729488&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow ugc&quot;&gt;Archive.org saved that auction&lt;a/&gt;, and no it doesn&#039;t look like it was Office for NT.

However, good news, &lt;a href=&quot;/2023/05/24/word-excel-for-mips/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow ugc&quot;&gt;they just showed up!&lt;/a&gt;.  If you wanted RISC Excel/Word, now is your chance!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/04/03/office-4-2-for-windows-nt/comment-page-1/#comment-256181">Beluga</a>.</p>
<p>Ironically <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20200919225216/https://www.ebay.com/p/1924517573?iid=372750729488" rel="nofollow ugc">Archive.org saved that auction<a></a>, and no it doesn&#8217;t look like it was Office for NT.</p>
<p>However, good news, </a><a href="/2023/05/24/word-excel-for-mips/" rel="nofollow ugc">they just showed up!</a>.  If you wanted RISC Excel/Word, now is your chance!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Beluga		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/04/03/office-4-2-for-windows-nt/comment-page-1/#comment-256181</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Beluga]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2020 19:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=408#comment-256181</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Regarding the PPC/MIPS version: I have been looking into some NT PPC stuff recently. While I found nothing substantial regarding MS Office, I did find this eBay listing:

https://www.ebay.com/itm/Microsoft-Office-Standard-Version-4-2-Word-6-0-Excel-5-0-PowerPoint-4-0-new-box-/372750729488

This version of Office 4.2 for NT is still shrinkwrapped and it does not have this sticker on it. It could be hint that there indeed was a release, I guess.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding the PPC/MIPS version: I have been looking into some NT PPC stuff recently. While I found nothing substantial regarding MS Office, I did find this eBay listing:</p>
<p><a href="https://www.ebay.com/itm/Microsoft-Office-Standard-Version-4-2-Word-6-0-Excel-5-0-PowerPoint-4-0-new-box-/372750729488" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.ebay.com/itm/Microsoft-Office-Standard-Version-4-2-Word-6-0-Excel-5-0-PowerPoint-4-0-new-box-/372750729488</a></p>
<p>This version of Office 4.2 for NT is still shrinkwrapped and it does not have this sticker on it. It could be hint that there indeed was a release, I guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: neozeed		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/04/03/office-4-2-for-windows-nt/comment-page-1/#comment-11773</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neozeed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 04:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=408#comment-11773</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/04/03/office-4-2-for-windows-nt/comment-page-1/#comment-11761&quot;&gt;ampharos&lt;/a&gt;.

Nice! It&#039;d make sense to have applications that can be scripted that way you could &#039;perform a variety of tasks&#039; and compare the output.. Its not surprising they&#039;d use a 32bit version of word &amp; excel, as I&#039;m sure as a part of their porting tools doing some &#039;real world&#039; stuff would be key, beyond things like notepad and solitaire...

Although I still have doubts if there ever was MIPS/PowerPC versions of excel/word.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/04/03/office-4-2-for-windows-nt/comment-page-1/#comment-11761">ampharos</a>.</p>
<p>Nice! It&#8217;d make sense to have applications that can be scripted that way you could &#8216;perform a variety of tasks&#8217; and compare the output.. Its not surprising they&#8217;d use a 32bit version of word &#038; excel, as I&#8217;m sure as a part of their porting tools doing some &#8216;real world&#8217; stuff would be key, beyond things like notepad and solitaire&#8230;</p>
<p>Although I still have doubts if there ever was MIPS/PowerPC versions of excel/word.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: ampharos		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/04/03/office-4-2-for-windows-nt/comment-page-1/#comment-11761</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ampharos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 23:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=408#comment-11761</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[For some reason MS has a stripped-down version of Word and Excel from these...

ftp://ftp.microsoft.com/Products/Oemtest/v1.1/Winstress/stress/i386/stress/

Check out excel32, word32, etc.

Public archives are a blessing :)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For some reason MS has a stripped-down version of Word and Excel from these&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="ftp://ftp.microsoft.com/Products/Oemtest/v1.1/Winstress/stress/i386/stress/" rel="ugc">ftp://ftp.microsoft.com/Products/Oemtest/v1.1/Winstress/stress/i386/stress/</a></p>
<p>Check out excel32, word32, etc.</p>
<p>Public archives are a blessing 🙂</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Neozeed		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/04/03/office-4-2-for-windows-nt/comment-page-1/#comment-437</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Neozeed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Apr 2011 21:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=408#comment-437</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It seems that 1.25 is ... more stable then 1.30  I recall when I actually used Win32s day to day, using 1.25 as it worked under OS/2 as well (with some &#039;fix&#039;)....&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;By the time 1.30 came out I think we were all running Windows 95?  I just remember that NT 3.5 had some good PPP support, but was too slow for day to day stuff, and 95 was amazingly fast and ran Win32 stuff way better then WinOS/2 / Win32s.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems that 1.25 is &#8230; more stable then 1.30  I recall when I actually used Win32s day to day, using 1.25 as it worked under OS/2 as well (with some &#39;fix&#39;)&#8230;.</p>
<p>By the time 1.30 came out I think we were all running Windows 95?  I just remember that NT 3.5 had some good PPP support, but was too slow for day to day stuff, and 95 was amazingly fast and ran Win32 stuff way better then WinOS/2 / Win32s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anonymous		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/04/03/office-4-2-for-windows-nt/comment-page-1/#comment-436</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Apr 2011 21:05:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=408#comment-436</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[OK, I found out why wave sounds weren&#039;t working properly in Windows 3.1 in DosBox - IRQ was set to 5 instead of 7, after fixing that both Windows sounds and SFX in Lemmings works (but SFX in Doom still doesn&#039;t).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;BTW, Win32s I have installed in is 1.30.172. Lemmings and Doom work, but Word doesn&#039;t - says &#034;There&#039;s not enough memory to run Word.&#034;.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, I found out why wave sounds weren&#39;t working properly in Windows 3.1 in DosBox &#8211; IRQ was set to 5 instead of 7, after fixing that both Windows sounds and SFX in Lemmings works (but SFX in Doom still doesn&#39;t).</p>
<p>BTW, Win32s I have installed in is 1.30.172. Lemmings and Doom work, but Word doesn&#39;t &#8211; says &quot;There&#39;s not enough memory to run Word.&quot;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
