<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: WinDoom, WinG, Win32s on Windows 3.1 (on Qemu)	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/03/29/windoom-wing-win32s-on-windows-3-1-on-qemu/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/03/29/windoom-wing-win32s-on-windows-3-1-on-qemu/</link>
	<description>Fun with Virtualization</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2025 13:21:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: lorezan486@gmail.com		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/03/29/windoom-wing-win32s-on-windows-3-1-on-qemu/comment-page-1/#comment-382034</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lorezan486@gmail.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2025 13:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=402#comment-382034</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[If you ever want to revisit WinDoom, here&#039;s the last version from June 95:
https://archive.org/details/win-doom-june-1-95]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you ever want to revisit WinDoom, here&#8217;s the last version from June 95:<br />
<a href="https://archive.org/details/win-doom-june-1-95" rel="nofollow ugc">https://archive.org/details/win-doom-june-1-95</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Stefan Ring		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/03/29/windoom-wing-win32s-on-windows-3-1-on-qemu/comment-page-1/#comment-319206</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stefan Ring]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2023 10:51:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=402#comment-319206</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/03/29/windoom-wing-win32s-on-windows-3-1-on-qemu/comment-page-1/#comment-202393&quot;&gt;The Cirrus Driver&lt;/a&gt;.

I went chasing down this driver myself yesterday, then found this blog post in my old notes after a few hours of fruitless downloading/installing. It’s still working fine in modern qemu versions except for some severe font glitches right after startup. This resolves itself after a few redraws, though.

You must not use the mode switching utility that gets started automatically after installation. This it what leads to &quot;Error loading cirrus.drv&quot;. Just cancel it and select the desired resolution from winsetup afterwards. I guess not every possible selection works, but I can attest to this working: GD5434 v1.25f, 1280x1024x64K Smlfnt]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/03/29/windoom-wing-win32s-on-windows-3-1-on-qemu/comment-page-1/#comment-202393">The Cirrus Driver</a>.</p>
<p>I went chasing down this driver myself yesterday, then found this blog post in my old notes after a few hours of fruitless downloading/installing. It’s still working fine in modern qemu versions except for some severe font glitches right after startup. This resolves itself after a few redraws, though.</p>
<p>You must not use the mode switching utility that gets started automatically after installation. This it what leads to &#8220;Error loading cirrus.drv&#8221;. Just cancel it and select the desired resolution from winsetup afterwards. I guess not every possible selection works, but I can attest to this working: GD5434 v1.25f, 1280x1024x64K Smlfnt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: neozeed		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/03/29/windoom-wing-win32s-on-windows-3-1-on-qemu/comment-page-1/#comment-203638</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neozeed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2018 02:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=402#comment-203638</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/03/29/windoom-wing-win32s-on-windows-3-1-on-qemu/comment-page-1/#comment-203632&quot;&gt;The Cirrus Driver&lt;/a&gt;.

I think it comes down the to the version of Qemu.  I&#039;ve been messing with the source, trying to add some other port mapped devices, I&#039;d like to eventually take some other emulators video emulation and incorporate those... baby steps first.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/03/29/windoom-wing-win32s-on-windows-3-1-on-qemu/comment-page-1/#comment-203632">The Cirrus Driver</a>.</p>
<p>I think it comes down the to the version of Qemu.  I&#8217;ve been messing with the source, trying to add some other port mapped devices, I&#8217;d like to eventually take some other emulators video emulation and incorporate those&#8230; baby steps first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: The Cirrus Driver		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/03/29/windoom-wing-win32s-on-windows-3-1-on-qemu/comment-page-1/#comment-203632</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Cirrus Driver]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2018 00:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=402#comment-203632</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/03/29/windoom-wing-win32s-on-windows-3-1-on-qemu/comment-page-1/#comment-202415&quot;&gt;neozeed&lt;/a&gt;.

Just thought I&#039;d follow up about Windows 3.1 SVGA in QEMU:

Instead of using &#039;-vga cirrus&#039;, I tried for &#039;-vga std&#039;, and used the patched version of the Microsoft 256-color SVGA driver, just as I had done previously to get 1024x768/8bit in DOSEMU.  It worked!  The thing that disturbs me though is, I&#039;m certain I did not neglect to try this before.  In fact, the original post mentions doing this, so if I&#039;d forgotten, this post would have reminded me to try it.  And I&#039;m sure I actually did, and it failed, just like it did for the OP author.  I&#039;m sure of it.  So now I went back and tried it again, and now it worked.

It&#039;s pretty slow -- you can actually watch the screen draw lines and paint windows, just like with QEMU&#039;s vanilla VGA, so it&#039;s probably not going to be fast enough for many games.  But without the driver, you&#039;ve got 640x480 in 16 colors, and with it, a decent 1024x768 in 256, so it&#039;s an improvement if only to have a big enough desktop that File Manager is comfortably usable.

My theory is that there are many strains and variations of the original Japheth SVGA patch floating around, and I&#039;ve downloaded a lot of them.  Maybe I tried a different one before?  Anyway, use the SVGA driver here:

https://www.resourcemate.com/other/svga.exe

And the patch here:

https://download.wcnews.com/files/other/wcpc/svgaptch.zip

Run QEMU (even a modern version) with &#039;-vga std&#039;, which is now the default, so on a new version you can leave -vga unspecified.  Patch SVGA256.DRV, install, and behold Windows 3.1 at 1024x768...still drawing pixels really slow, but at this point, I&#039;ll take it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/03/29/windoom-wing-win32s-on-windows-3-1-on-qemu/comment-page-1/#comment-202415">neozeed</a>.</p>
<p>Just thought I&#8217;d follow up about Windows 3.1 SVGA in QEMU:</p>
<p>Instead of using &#8216;-vga cirrus&#8217;, I tried for &#8216;-vga std&#8217;, and used the patched version of the Microsoft 256-color SVGA driver, just as I had done previously to get 1024&#215;768/8bit in DOSEMU.  It worked!  The thing that disturbs me though is, I&#8217;m certain I did not neglect to try this before.  In fact, the original post mentions doing this, so if I&#8217;d forgotten, this post would have reminded me to try it.  And I&#8217;m sure I actually did, and it failed, just like it did for the OP author.  I&#8217;m sure of it.  So now I went back and tried it again, and now it worked.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s pretty slow &#8212; you can actually watch the screen draw lines and paint windows, just like with QEMU&#8217;s vanilla VGA, so it&#8217;s probably not going to be fast enough for many games.  But without the driver, you&#8217;ve got 640&#215;480 in 16 colors, and with it, a decent 1024&#215;768 in 256, so it&#8217;s an improvement if only to have a big enough desktop that File Manager is comfortably usable.</p>
<p>My theory is that there are many strains and variations of the original Japheth SVGA patch floating around, and I&#8217;ve downloaded a lot of them.  Maybe I tried a different one before?  Anyway, use the SVGA driver here:</p>
<p><a href="https://www.resourcemate.com/other/svga.exe" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.resourcemate.com/other/svga.exe</a></p>
<p>And the patch here:</p>
<p><a href="https://download.wcnews.com/files/other/wcpc/svgaptch.zip" rel="nofollow ugc">https://download.wcnews.com/files/other/wcpc/svgaptch.zip</a></p>
<p>Run QEMU (even a modern version) with &#8216;-vga std&#8217;, which is now the default, so on a new version you can leave -vga unspecified.  Patch SVGA256.DRV, install, and behold Windows 3.1 at 1024&#215;768&#8230;still drawing pixels really slow, but at this point, I&#8217;ll take it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: neozeed		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/03/29/windoom-wing-win32s-on-windows-3-1-on-qemu/comment-page-1/#comment-202415</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neozeed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2018 03:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=402#comment-202415</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/03/29/windoom-wing-win32s-on-windows-3-1-on-qemu/comment-page-1/#comment-202406&quot;&gt;The Cirrus Driver&lt;/a&gt;.

It&#039;s always been anything but really compatible.  I&#039;ve found that setting the chip to a lower version, and using an actual ROM helped a LOT when it came to emulation but when others have found issues with the emulation patches have been rejected.  Just as when the IDE emulaiton drifted out of working with things like netware and nextstep there was zero interest in trying to address them.

Qemu is just being used as the emulated hardware base for KVM to run Linux...  It&#039;s basically it&#039;s entire reason for existing at this point.

Newer doesn&#039;t meat better, the older versions were in many ways not only more compatible, but significantly faster. You just need GCC version 3 to build them.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/03/29/windoom-wing-win32s-on-windows-3-1-on-qemu/comment-page-1/#comment-202406">The Cirrus Driver</a>.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s always been anything but really compatible.  I&#8217;ve found that setting the chip to a lower version, and using an actual ROM helped a LOT when it came to emulation but when others have found issues with the emulation patches have been rejected.  Just as when the IDE emulaiton drifted out of working with things like netware and nextstep there was zero interest in trying to address them.</p>
<p>Qemu is just being used as the emulated hardware base for KVM to run Linux&#8230;  It&#8217;s basically it&#8217;s entire reason for existing at this point.</p>
<p>Newer doesn&#8217;t meat better, the older versions were in many ways not only more compatible, but significantly faster. You just need GCC version 3 to build them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: The Cirrus Driver		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/03/29/windoom-wing-win32s-on-windows-3-1-on-qemu/comment-page-1/#comment-202406</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Cirrus Driver]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2018 18:52:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=402#comment-202406</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/03/29/windoom-wing-win32s-on-windows-3-1-on-qemu/comment-page-1/#comment-202397&quot;&gt;neozeed&lt;/a&gt;.

It&#039;s ok, I already have Windows 3.1 SVGA working in DOSemu using Microsoft&#039;s patched 256-color driver, but because I&#039;m greedy and I want it all, I wanted to see if I could have it available and fully working in current QEMU as well, since each of these virtualization options has its own problems and advantages.  (Certainly DOSemu is quite hit and miss.)  It looks like, short of going back to an earlier QEMU, there&#039;s probably no Windows 3.1 SVGA for me.  Oh well...

The reason I&#039;m doing all this old platform emulation is because I never want to give up my old MIDI/studio software.  I more or less collect audio/MIDI tools on DOS, Windows 3.1, WIN32, MacOS, Commodore 64/128, Amiga, Atari, and I&#039;m on Linux natively, and I try to have all the tools (toys?) available, in emulation if possible, but also actual old hardware is an option as well with its own problems and advantages.  Basically, I&#039;ve gone off the deep end with this.  If it was only about the music, it would be crazy, but I like the production process enough that for me it&#039;s also become about how the sausage is made.

Anyway, it amazes me that QEMU made this Cirrus emulation with the specific intention of being as compatible as possible, and it&#039;s actually evolved into the finickiest video chipset real or virtual that I think I&#039;ve ever seen anywhere.  In WIN16, nothing will satisfy it.  How compatible is that?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/03/29/windoom-wing-win32s-on-windows-3-1-on-qemu/comment-page-1/#comment-202397">neozeed</a>.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s ok, I already have Windows 3.1 SVGA working in DOSemu using Microsoft&#8217;s patched 256-color driver, but because I&#8217;m greedy and I want it all, I wanted to see if I could have it available and fully working in current QEMU as well, since each of these virtualization options has its own problems and advantages.  (Certainly DOSemu is quite hit and miss.)  It looks like, short of going back to an earlier QEMU, there&#8217;s probably no Windows 3.1 SVGA for me.  Oh well&#8230;</p>
<p>The reason I&#8217;m doing all this old platform emulation is because I never want to give up my old MIDI/studio software.  I more or less collect audio/MIDI tools on DOS, Windows 3.1, WIN32, MacOS, Commodore 64/128, Amiga, Atari, and I&#8217;m on Linux natively, and I try to have all the tools (toys?) available, in emulation if possible, but also actual old hardware is an option as well with its own problems and advantages.  Basically, I&#8217;ve gone off the deep end with this.  If it was only about the music, it would be crazy, but I like the production process enough that for me it&#8217;s also become about how the sausage is made.</p>
<p>Anyway, it amazes me that QEMU made this Cirrus emulation with the specific intention of being as compatible as possible, and it&#8217;s actually evolved into the finickiest video chipset real or virtual that I think I&#8217;ve ever seen anywhere.  In WIN16, nothing will satisfy it.  How compatible is that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: neozeed		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/03/29/windoom-wing-win32s-on-windows-3-1-on-qemu/comment-page-1/#comment-202397</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neozeed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2018 08:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=402#comment-202397</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/03/29/windoom-wing-win32s-on-windows-3-1-on-qemu/comment-page-1/#comment-202393&quot;&gt;The Cirrus Driver&lt;/a&gt;.

It&#039;s probably the video settings... the older qemu got, the less it cared about preserving anything regarding older system comparability.

Granted I&#039;m using Windows, but this ought to run on Wine I&#039;d imagine.

&lt;a href=&quot;https://vpsland.superglobalmegacorp.com/install/Windows3.1/WinDoom-qemu090.7z&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;This is version of Qemu 0.90 that I&#039;ve been messing with&lt;/a&gt;.  Mostly to tell you as you run it what it&#039;s doing.  It&#039;s all GCC 3.45 built so it ought to be old enough to be stable.  Qemu 0.90 was the last real great version before the GCC people messed up Qemu.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/03/29/windoom-wing-win32s-on-windows-3-1-on-qemu/comment-page-1/#comment-202393">The Cirrus Driver</a>.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s probably the video settings&#8230; the older qemu got, the less it cared about preserving anything regarding older system comparability.</p>
<p>Granted I&#8217;m using Windows, but this ought to run on Wine I&#8217;d imagine.</p>
<p><a href="https://vpsland.superglobalmegacorp.com/install/Windows3.1/WinDoom-qemu090.7z" rel="nofollow">This is version of Qemu 0.90 that I&#8217;ve been messing with</a>.  Mostly to tell you as you run it what it&#8217;s doing.  It&#8217;s all GCC 3.45 built so it ought to be old enough to be stable.  Qemu 0.90 was the last real great version before the GCC people messed up Qemu.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: The Cirrus Driver		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/03/29/windoom-wing-win32s-on-windows-3-1-on-qemu/comment-page-1/#comment-202393</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Cirrus Driver]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2018 08:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=402#comment-202393</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/03/29/windoom-wing-win32s-on-windows-3-1-on-qemu/comment-page-1/#comment-202389&quot;&gt;neozeed&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks for all the help, but I&#039;m getting &quot;Error loading cirrus.drv&quot; when Windows starts with this one.  Also, I&#039;ve noticed that not only with this driver, but also with a lot of the other Cirrus drivers I looked at while searching, there are no monitor frequencies supplied for any model of monitor (all frequency pulldowns are blank).  It seems like some of the versions have that and some don&#039;t, and the ones that don&#039;t have any refresh options to choose from won&#039;t even start Windows when the guest reboots.  (That&#039;s what I&#039;m seeing with this one.)  The ones that do supply a list of monitor frequencies for the pulldown menus usually will let Windows start, but the display is corrupted.  For what it&#039;s worth, I&#039;m running QEMU 2.10.1 on Linux.

It&#039;s ok if you don&#039;t have any more ideas, because at this point, neither do I.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/03/29/windoom-wing-win32s-on-windows-3-1-on-qemu/comment-page-1/#comment-202389">neozeed</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks for all the help, but I&#8217;m getting &#8220;Error loading cirrus.drv&#8221; when Windows starts with this one.  Also, I&#8217;ve noticed that not only with this driver, but also with a lot of the other Cirrus drivers I looked at while searching, there are no monitor frequencies supplied for any model of monitor (all frequency pulldowns are blank).  It seems like some of the versions have that and some don&#8217;t, and the ones that don&#8217;t have any refresh options to choose from won&#8217;t even start Windows when the guest reboots.  (That&#8217;s what I&#8217;m seeing with this one.)  The ones that do supply a list of monitor frequencies for the pulldown menus usually will let Windows start, but the display is corrupted.  For what it&#8217;s worth, I&#8217;m running QEMU 2.10.1 on Linux.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s ok if you don&#8217;t have any more ideas, because at this point, neither do I.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: neozeed		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/03/29/windoom-wing-win32s-on-windows-3-1-on-qemu/comment-page-1/#comment-202389</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neozeed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2018 07:06:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=402#comment-202389</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/03/29/windoom-wing-win32s-on-windows-3-1-on-qemu/comment-page-1/#comment-202382&quot;&gt;The Cirrus Driver (driving you mad, one SVGA card at a time)&lt;/a&gt;.

I&#039;m guessing &lt;a href=&quot;https://vpsland.superglobalmegacorp.com/install/Windows3.1/HP-Cirrus-Logic-5434-win31-driver.exe&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;This is it&lt;/a&gt;?.  You&#039;ll get a 404, but read the 404 for the username password as they are auto generated.

Going through archive.org I see &lt;a href=&quot;https://web.archive.org/web/20150809183538/http://h20565.www2.hp.com/hpsc/swd/public/detail?sp4ts.oid=100619&amp;swItemId=1093&amp;lang=en&amp;cc=emea_middle_east&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;that this is the old page before the HP separation&lt;/a&gt; (ak the last &amp; only time it was archived)

&lt;p&gt;
Type:	Driver - Display / Monitor&lt;br&gt;
Version:	1.25 A(5 Mar 1997)&lt;br&gt;
Operating System(s):	Microsoft Windows 3.1&lt;br&gt;
Microsoft Windows for Workgroups 3.11&lt;br&gt;
File name:	sp2904.exe (2.0 MB)&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

Hope that helps]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/03/29/windoom-wing-win32s-on-windows-3-1-on-qemu/comment-page-1/#comment-202382">The Cirrus Driver (driving you mad, one SVGA card at a time)</a>.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m guessing <a href="https://vpsland.superglobalmegacorp.com/install/Windows3.1/HP-Cirrus-Logic-5434-win31-driver.exe" rel="nofollow">This is it</a>?.  You&#8217;ll get a 404, but read the 404 for the username password as they are auto generated.</p>
<p>Going through archive.org I see <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20150809183538/http://h20565.www2.hp.com/hpsc/swd/public/detail?sp4ts.oid=100619&#038;swItemId=1093&#038;lang=en&#038;cc=emea_middle_east" rel="nofollow">that this is the old page before the HP separation</a> (ak the last &#038; only time it was archived)</p>
<p>
Type:	Driver &#8211; Display / Monitor<br />
Version:	1.25 A(5 Mar 1997)<br />
Operating System(s):	Microsoft Windows 3.1<br />
Microsoft Windows for Workgroups 3.11<br />
File name:	sp2904.exe (2.0 MB)</p>
<p>Hope that helps</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: The Cirrus Driver (driving you mad, one SVGA card at a time)		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/03/29/windoom-wing-win32s-on-windows-3-1-on-qemu/comment-page-1/#comment-202382</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Cirrus Driver (driving you mad, one SVGA card at a time)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2018 03:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=402#comment-202382</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I have spent a few days on a regular Indiana Jones quest of the Internet looking for this fabled HP GD5430 v1.25f Windows 3.1 driver, trying one Cirrus driver after another.  The link to HP&#039;s support site has gone dead, and their current driver support page has a search engine that requires an actual HP product number to look for anything.  (I&#039;m guessing they probably don&#039;t have old Windows 3.1 Cirrus drivers anyway.)

Do you think you could post or link to the actual driver you&#039;re using?  After having tried many of them, I&#039;m quite sure at this point that you&#039;ve got something pretty unique and useful.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have spent a few days on a regular Indiana Jones quest of the Internet looking for this fabled HP GD5430 v1.25f Windows 3.1 driver, trying one Cirrus driver after another.  The link to HP&#8217;s support site has gone dead, and their current driver support page has a search engine that requires an actual HP product number to look for anything.  (I&#8217;m guessing they probably don&#8217;t have old Windows 3.1 Cirrus drivers anyway.)</p>
<p>Do you think you could post or link to the actual driver you&#8217;re using?  After having tried many of them, I&#8217;m quite sure at this point that you&#8217;ve got something pretty unique and useful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
