<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Multiuser DOS	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/01/28/multiuser-dos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/01/28/multiuser-dos/</link>
	<description>Fun with Virtualization</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 14:53:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Neozeed		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/01/28/multiuser-dos/comment-page-1/#comment-391</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Neozeed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 14:53:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=352#comment-391</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;d suggest trying qemu...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;d suggest trying qemu&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Stuart		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/01/28/multiuser-dos/comment-page-1/#comment-390</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stuart]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 14:49:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=352#comment-390</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[My company still runs an MRP system on real32. In fact I&#039;m trying to get in to run on VPC 2007 but having problems with the networking aspect.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My company still runs an MRP system on real32. In fact I&#39;m trying to get in to run on VPC 2007 but having problems with the networking aspect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Neozeed		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/01/28/multiuser-dos/comment-page-1/#comment-387</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Neozeed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 13:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=352#comment-387</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t see it on their product list..  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.phystechsoft.com/ptsdos/products.php&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Although the nuclear power plant symbol is a little worrisome that some nuke plant is running DOS.  I guess it can easily be run like a RTOS.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#39;t see it on their product list..  </p>
<p><a href="http://www.phystechsoft.com/ptsdos/products.php" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.phystechsoft.com/ptsdos/products.php</a></p>
<p>Although the nuclear power plant symbol is a little worrisome that some nuke plant is running DOS.  I guess it can easily be run like a RTOS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: atar		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/01/28/multiuser-dos/comment-page-1/#comment-386</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[atar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 13:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=352#comment-386</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Think that there were a multitasking version of PTS-DOS, but can&#039;t find any references.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Think that there were a multitasking version of PTS-DOS, but can&#39;t find any references.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Neozeed		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/01/28/multiuser-dos/comment-page-1/#comment-381</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Neozeed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 14:55:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=352#comment-381</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Qemu may be able to boot it.....!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I have the feeling that there was quite a bit of these things out there... And some still remain.  It sure is an interesting aspect of non Unix based Multi User systems for the 80386.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Qemu may be able to boot it&#8230;..!</p>
<p>I have the feeling that there was quite a bit of these things out there&#8230; And some still remain.  It sure is an interesting aspect of non Unix based Multi User systems for the 80386.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Geoff		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/01/28/multiuser-dos/comment-page-1/#comment-380</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Geoff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 14:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=352#comment-380</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Just had to chime in on this one - I don&#039;t know of others, but I ran my business from 1991 - 1999 using PC-MOS with a mix of custom and off-the-shelf software on a 386 machine.  I wrote my own email program in Visual Basic called &#034;MosMail&#034; At one point I had as many as 8 terminals running.  It was a good system.  I was able to preserve the software and I can still boot up the system in VirtualPC, but only in version 4 (prior to Microsoft, when it was a Connectix product).  Wow, I miss that system...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just had to chime in on this one &#8211; I don&#39;t know of others, but I ran my business from 1991 &#8211; 1999 using PC-MOS with a mix of custom and off-the-shelf software on a 386 machine.  I wrote my own email program in Visual Basic called &quot;MosMail&quot; At one point I had as many as 8 terminals running.  It was a good system.  I was able to preserve the software and I can still boot up the system in VirtualPC, but only in version 4 (prior to Microsoft, when it was a Connectix product).  Wow, I miss that system&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
