<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Concurrent DOS/386	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/01/28/concurrent-dos386/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/01/28/concurrent-dos386/</link>
	<description>Fun with Virtualization</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2017 12:16:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Yuhong Bao		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/01/28/concurrent-dos386/comment-page-1/#comment-146210</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yuhong Bao]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2015 05:24:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=353#comment-146210</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Yep, even REAL/32 still had CP/M-86 app support. When they added FAT32 support, they still had to support FCBs for these apps, making DOS FCB support almost free (unlike MS-DOS which ditched FCB support almost completely with FAT32!).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, even REAL/32 still had CP/M-86 app support. When they added FAT32 support, they still had to support FCBs for these apps, making DOS FCB support almost free (unlike MS-DOS which ditched FCB support almost completely with FAT32!).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ranjit Pandab		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/01/28/concurrent-dos386/comment-page-1/#comment-89599</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ranjit Pandab]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2014 04:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=353#comment-89599</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I want Real/32]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want Real/32</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: dieymir		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/01/28/concurrent-dos386/comment-page-1/#comment-73994</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dieymir]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2014 07:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=353#comment-73994</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/01/28/concurrent-dos386/comment-page-1/#comment-71478&quot;&gt;Blue Jinn&lt;/a&gt;.

I&#039;m interested in those updates/patches for Multiuser DOS 5.1 that you own. Please, Could you contact with me??

Thanks]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/01/28/concurrent-dos386/comment-page-1/#comment-71478">Blue Jinn</a>.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m interested in those updates/patches for Multiuser DOS 5.1 that you own. Please, Could you contact with me??</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Blue Jinn		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/01/28/concurrent-dos386/comment-page-1/#comment-71478</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Blue Jinn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2014 23:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=353#comment-71478</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Sorry, pushed comment to soon. I don&#039;t have the box or the user guides, and there were several updates and patches I downloaded from Compuserve. Also, the version was 5.1, not 7.1.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, pushed comment to soon. I don&#8217;t have the box or the user guides, and there were several updates and patches I downloaded from Compuserve. Also, the version was 5.1, not 7.1.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Blue Jinn		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/01/28/concurrent-dos386/comment-page-1/#comment-71477</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Blue Jinn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2014 23:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=353#comment-71477</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A previous office ran Novell MultiuserDOS 7.1. We ran the OS on a then top of the line 486 PC compatible, and had serial terminals connected to a Digiboard PC/X. 

We ran a terminal emulator in Windows, and ran a DOS programs (WordStar 7.0 &#038; WordPerfect &#038; Timeslips DOS.) Multiuser DOS would essentially open a &quot;DOS session&quot; for each terminal and an instance of whatever DOS program. The OS would also run CP/M-86 software, and the senior partner insisted on running WordStar CP/M on a Televideo terminal. Users could share the &quot;C:\&quot; drive, but there was also built in Netware support, and each user could access a share drive, in our case, a Netware emulator on a Linux box. The share drive was also then available to other machines, using other network protocols.  The OS was very stable and reliable.


You need a standard IBM compatible PC. You also need Multiuser DOS. Version 7.0 required a dongle. 7.1 did not. I have the set of 5.25&quot; floppies and the dongle.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A previous office ran Novell MultiuserDOS 7.1. We ran the OS on a then top of the line 486 PC compatible, and had serial terminals connected to a Digiboard PC/X. </p>
<p>We ran a terminal emulator in Windows, and ran a DOS programs (WordStar 7.0 &amp; WordPerfect &amp; Timeslips DOS.) Multiuser DOS would essentially open a &#8220;DOS session&#8221; for each terminal and an instance of whatever DOS program. The OS would also run CP/M-86 software, and the senior partner insisted on running WordStar CP/M on a Televideo terminal. Users could share the &#8220;C:\&#8221; drive, but there was also built in Netware support, and each user could access a share drive, in our case, a Netware emulator on a Linux box. The share drive was also then available to other machines, using other network protocols.  The OS was very stable and reliable.</p>
<p>You need a standard IBM compatible PC. You also need Multiuser DOS. Version 7.0 required a dongle. 7.1 did not. I have the set of 5.25&#8243; floppies and the dongle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: William T		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/01/28/concurrent-dos386/comment-page-1/#comment-65796</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[William T]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2014 22:36:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=353#comment-65796</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Dear, I would need help in order to install and run MultiuserDOS. I have send you an email. Cheers, William.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear, I would need help in order to install and run MultiuserDOS. I have send you an email. Cheers, William.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Neozeed		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/01/28/concurrent-dos386/comment-page-1/#comment-385</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Neozeed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 01:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=353#comment-385</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[shoot me an email ... neozeed .AT. gmail .DOT. com &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I&#039;m sure we can google something.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>shoot me an email &#8230; neozeed .AT. gmail .DOT. com </p>
<p>I&#39;m sure we can google something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Geoff		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/01/28/concurrent-dos386/comment-page-1/#comment-384</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Geoff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 01:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=353#comment-384</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[You got me to dig out my qemu and 386-dos disk images.  I am able to boot the floppy but I cannot seem to get it to install - have you had any luck with installing the 1987 version in anything?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You got me to dig out my qemu and 386-dos disk images.  I am able to boot the floppy but I cannot seem to get it to install &#8211; have you had any luck with installing the 1987 version in anything?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
