<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Quake1 with WATTCP built with DJGPP on DOSBox	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/01/05/quake1-with-wattcp-built-with-djgpp-on-dosbox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/01/05/quake1-with-wattcp-built-with-djgpp-on-dosbox/</link>
	<description>Fun with Virtualization</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2012 05:07:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: neozeed		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/01/05/quake1-with-wattcp-built-with-djgpp-on-dosbox/comment-page-1/#comment-18047</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neozeed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2012 05:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=340#comment-18047</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/01/05/quake1-with-wattcp-built-with-djgpp-on-dosbox/comment-page-1/#comment-18038&quot;&gt;Rugxulo&lt;/a&gt;.

I&#039;ve had major issues with old versions of cygwin1.dll locking up windows bad.. and really really old stuff working just fine... There is some weirdisims about cygwin &amp; the win32 stack that I don&#039;t even remember other than XP sp2 and beyond really changed the way it worked.

building binutils/gcc can be a pain, doing a cross build can be a royal pain... I think they &#039;solved&#039; a lot of that stuff with &quot;Canadian Cross&quot; builds where you have a cross compiler building a cross compiler....

A million years ago there was a version of GCC you could build with Visual C++, I wonder if that could build a cross compiler for DJGPP, although again that all sounds rather confusing!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/01/05/quake1-with-wattcp-built-with-djgpp-on-dosbox/comment-page-1/#comment-18038">Rugxulo</a>.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve had major issues with old versions of cygwin1.dll locking up windows bad.. and really really old stuff working just fine&#8230; There is some weirdisims about cygwin &#038; the win32 stack that I don&#8217;t even remember other than XP sp2 and beyond really changed the way it worked.</p>
<p>building binutils/gcc can be a pain, doing a cross build can be a royal pain&#8230; I think they &#8216;solved&#8217; a lot of that stuff with &#8220;Canadian Cross&#8221; builds where you have a cross compiler building a cross compiler&#8230;.</p>
<p>A million years ago there was a version of GCC you could build with Visual C++, I wonder if that could build a cross compiler for DJGPP, although again that all sounds rather confusing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Rugxulo		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2011/01/05/quake1-with-wattcp-built-with-djgpp-on-dosbox/comment-page-1/#comment-18038</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rugxulo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2012 03:51:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=340#comment-18038</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Sorry for the very late response to this, feel free to ignore .... I did find out about your Cygwin cross-compiler a week or two ago, and finally just now tested it.

Honestly, I was too distrusting and lazy to actually run it under Cygwin&#039;s Bash environment, though you didn&#039;t include cygwin1.dll, so I did have to copy that over. (Not sure which Cygwin this was tested with, but apparently it works even with newer 1.7.) So I ended up having loads of problems trying to find headers and object files and libraries, but after a few lame kludges (-L switch, copying files, etc), it finally worked (Win7 64-bit SP1 Home Premium) and compiled a very simple example correctly.

I love &quot;classic&quot; GCC 2.95.3, but BinUtils 2.9.1? Meh? What&#039;s worse is DJGPP 2.02 [sic], I&#039;d rather have 2.03p2 with Win2k fixes. But it doesn&#039;t matter atop Win64 anyways, so DOSBox ftw!   ;-)

Yeah, we&#039;ve really needed a good Cygwin hosted cross-compiler for DJGPP for years now, but I was never adventurous enough to rebuild it. (Tried and failed. GCC is a pain.) Honestly not sure this one is 100% ideal, but it&#039;s loads better than nothing!   ;-)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry for the very late response to this, feel free to ignore &#8230;. I did find out about your Cygwin cross-compiler a week or two ago, and finally just now tested it.</p>
<p>Honestly, I was too distrusting and lazy to actually run it under Cygwin&#8217;s Bash environment, though you didn&#8217;t include cygwin1.dll, so I did have to copy that over. (Not sure which Cygwin this was tested with, but apparently it works even with newer 1.7.) So I ended up having loads of problems trying to find headers and object files and libraries, but after a few lame kludges (-L switch, copying files, etc), it finally worked (Win7 64-bit SP1 Home Premium) and compiled a very simple example correctly.</p>
<p>I love &#8220;classic&#8221; GCC 2.95.3, but BinUtils 2.9.1? Meh? What&#8217;s worse is DJGPP 2.02 [sic], I&#8217;d rather have 2.03p2 with Win2k fixes. But it doesn&#8217;t matter atop Win64 anyways, so DOSBox ftw!   😉</p>
<p>Yeah, we&#8217;ve really needed a good Cygwin hosted cross-compiler for DJGPP for years now, but I was never adventurous enough to rebuild it. (Tried and failed. GCC is a pain.) Honestly not sure this one is 100% ideal, but it&#8217;s loads better than nothing!   😉</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
