Comments on: 386BSD 0.0 boots! https://virtuallyfun.com/2010/12/07/386bsd-0-0-boots/ Fun with Virtualization Sat, 06 Jul 2013 00:01:25 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0 By: neozeed https://virtuallyfun.com/2010/12/07/386bsd-0-0-boots/comment-page-1/#comment-15229 Sat, 30 Jun 2012 18:13:26 +0000 https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=313#comment-15229 I just realized the bochsrc I had used didn’t have the disk definition in there, so I’ve corrected that. I’m using BOCHS 2.4.5 if it maters.

]]> By: Roy https://virtuallyfun.com/2010/12/07/386bsd-0-0-boots/comment-page-1/#comment-11179 Fri, 13 Apr 2012 15:42:15 +0000 https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=313#comment-11179 In reply to neozeed.

OK I dug the bsd newsgroup archive and I found this useful:
http://www.dnull.com/bsd/oldnews/bsdnew1761.html

]]> By: neozeed https://virtuallyfun.com/2010/12/07/386bsd-0-0-boots/comment-page-1/#comment-11176 Fri, 13 Apr 2012 14:45:31 +0000 https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=313#comment-11176 In reply to Roy.

I dont remember, I think I just kept on running it, or just ran ‘make’ … maybe I commented that phase out of the makefile, I forget…

But 0.0 was pretty ‘broken’ as it was basically in ‘it booted’ status, there was a lot of people who helped to make it into 0.1 status.. esp with working multiuser support which 0.0 lacks.

The fact you can even boot 0.0 is a major milestone.

]]> By: Roy https://virtuallyfun.com/2010/12/07/386bsd-0-0-boots/comment-page-1/#comment-11163 Fri, 13 Apr 2012 08:13:43 +0000 https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=313#comment-11163 How can you get rid of the “make depend” producing super-long command line which causes kernel reboots?

]]> By: Neozeed https://virtuallyfun.com/2010/12/07/386bsd-0-0-boots/comment-page-1/#comment-373 Tue, 18 Jan 2011 00:41:13 +0000 https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=313#comment-373 No, I haven't seen a good source of minix 1.x stuff, but then I haven't looked too hard either. I should also check that wayback machine for that uclinux that ran on the Atari ST….

]]> By: Anonymous https://virtuallyfun.com/2010/12/07/386bsd-0-0-boots/comment-page-1/#comment-372 Tue, 18 Jan 2011 00:34:24 +0000 https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=313#comment-372 Have you try setup and run Minix 1.0 or 1.1 in a VM?

]]> By: Neozeed https://virtuallyfun.com/2010/12/07/386bsd-0-0-boots/comment-page-1/#comment-344 Tue, 07 Dec 2010 15:13:55 +0000 https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=313#comment-344 I don't know I may do that one, although I figure it'll require me to do a bunch of work from dumping the filesystem, and probably building a kernel outside of itself….

for me, the largest factor is some 'bug' in flow control in qemu/slirp that makes downloading EXTREMELY slow, however uploading from httpd is super fast.. go figure.

]]> By: casaubon https://virtuallyfun.com/2010/12/07/386bsd-0-0-boots/comment-page-1/#comment-343 Tue, 07 Dec 2010 12:46:31 +0000 https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=313#comment-343 it's interesting how you always seem to be fascinated with earlier and earlier versions. i'm usually interested in the last stable of everything. might be because i'm an archiver-type and a mental completionist.. : )

are you planning on doing 386bsd 1.0?

]]>