<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: NetBSD 0.8 kernel boots!	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2010/12/05/netbsd-0-8-kernel-boots/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2010/12/05/netbsd-0-8-kernel-boots/</link>
	<description>Fun with Virtualization</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2019 02:39:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: boomer3200		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2010/12/05/netbsd-0-8-kernel-boots/comment-page-1/#comment-223474</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[boomer3200]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2019 02:39:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=310#comment-223474</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://virtuallyfun.com/2010/12/05/netbsd-0-8-kernel-boots/comment-page-1/#comment-157506&quot;&gt;neozeed&lt;/a&gt;.

gsrc09.024 was the problem file in the NetBSD 0.9 sources.  I can send you a copy to post if you are interested.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2010/12/05/netbsd-0-8-kernel-boots/comment-page-1/#comment-157506">neozeed</a>.</p>
<p>gsrc09.024 was the problem file in the NetBSD 0.9 sources.  I can send you a copy to post if you are interested.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: neozeed		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2010/12/05/netbsd-0-8-kernel-boots/comment-page-1/#comment-157506</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neozeed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2016 02:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=310#comment-157506</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://virtuallyfun.com/2010/12/05/netbsd-0-8-kernel-boots/comment-page-1/#comment-157497&quot;&gt;tj&lt;/a&gt;.

A while ago I found a dump of the 1993 tree to the original &lt;a href=&quot;http://vpsland.superglobalmegacorp.com/old/install/NetBSD/NetBSD-0.8/Original/NetBSD-0.8/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;NetBSD 0.8 here&lt;/a&gt;, although, it kind of kills the spirit of splicing in bits of 386BSD pl32 and NetBSD 0.9 to get a booting system, but it&#039;s been saved!

I&#039;ll try to take a look at the broken gsrc, I&#039;m not sure whats up with that, I did build world at one point, so I&#039;d have to assume it was whole at one point.

I&#039;m glad you enjoyed the whole article set, sadly at the time, the majority of the feedback I got from people was &#039;why bother&#039;, and that 0.8 is too old to care about.  But I still view NetBSD 0.8 &amp; 0.9 as a historical significance along with &lt;a href=&quot;http://virtuallyfun.superglobalmegacorp.com/2010/11/30/netbsd-1-2-the-microvax-ii/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;1.2 with the return to the VAX&lt;/a&gt;!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2010/12/05/netbsd-0-8-kernel-boots/comment-page-1/#comment-157497">tj</a>.</p>
<p>A while ago I found a dump of the 1993 tree to the original <a href="http://vpsland.superglobalmegacorp.com/old/install/NetBSD/NetBSD-0.8/Original/NetBSD-0.8/" rel="nofollow">NetBSD 0.8 here</a>, although, it kind of kills the spirit of splicing in bits of 386BSD pl32 and NetBSD 0.9 to get a booting system, but it&#8217;s been saved!</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll try to take a look at the broken gsrc, I&#8217;m not sure whats up with that, I did build world at one point, so I&#8217;d have to assume it was whole at one point.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad you enjoyed the whole article set, sadly at the time, the majority of the feedback I got from people was &#8216;why bother&#8217;, and that 0.8 is too old to care about.  But I still view NetBSD 0.8 &#038; 0.9 as a historical significance along with <a href="http://virtuallyfun.superglobalmegacorp.com/2010/11/30/netbsd-1-2-the-microvax-ii/" rel="nofollow">1.2 with the return to the VAX</a>!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: tj		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2010/12/05/netbsd-0-8-kernel-boots/comment-page-1/#comment-157497</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tj]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2016 22:17:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=310#comment-157497</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Having read through all your posts regarding ancient versions of NetBSD, I have to say that you did a great job in restoring a 1990s picture of what UNIX computing looked like on commodity hardware. The NetBSD-0.9 binary distribution archive is also awesome. However, kernel floppy image does not boot on QEMU (Bochs BIOS) for some reason. Also, gsrc09 is broken (some files are missing).

I did my own experiment and figured out that you actually don&#039;t have to install 386BSD or load the floppy in Bochs before getting NetBSD-0.8 to run in QEMU. Just copy NetBSD 0.8 AHA kernel (386bsd) to a FreeBSD 1.0 boot floppy (correct me if I remembered the wrong release), and it will work like a charm. Well, to put it simply, this means using FreeBSD&#039;s boot code to load NetBSD kernel given that they both derived from 386BSD :) It is NetBSD&#039;s buggy floppy boot code that is to blame, but to debug boot code is out of the scope of my project.

For 0.9, I am unsure if the CVS checkout (netbsd-0.9-src.tar.gz) can be used instead for /usr/src, but at least a simple grep shows there is probably no &quot;intentionally removed&quot; file (as opposed to 0.8 where tens of files were deleted). Only gsrc09 is damaged, so just replace /usr/src/gnu directory contents with the CVS version. If anyone could find the original copies of gsrc09.024~026 (and make sure they are from the same CD-ROM; better get an ISO image), life would become a lot easier.

Keep posting cool stuff!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having read through all your posts regarding ancient versions of NetBSD, I have to say that you did a great job in restoring a 1990s picture of what UNIX computing looked like on commodity hardware. The NetBSD-0.9 binary distribution archive is also awesome. However, kernel floppy image does not boot on QEMU (Bochs BIOS) for some reason. Also, gsrc09 is broken (some files are missing).</p>
<p>I did my own experiment and figured out that you actually don&#8217;t have to install 386BSD or load the floppy in Bochs before getting NetBSD-0.8 to run in QEMU. Just copy NetBSD 0.8 AHA kernel (386bsd) to a FreeBSD 1.0 boot floppy (correct me if I remembered the wrong release), and it will work like a charm. Well, to put it simply, this means using FreeBSD&#8217;s boot code to load NetBSD kernel given that they both derived from 386BSD 🙂 It is NetBSD&#8217;s buggy floppy boot code that is to blame, but to debug boot code is out of the scope of my project.</p>
<p>For 0.9, I am unsure if the CVS checkout (netbsd-0.9-src.tar.gz) can be used instead for /usr/src, but at least a simple grep shows there is probably no &#8220;intentionally removed&#8221; file (as opposed to 0.8 where tens of files were deleted). Only gsrc09 is damaged, so just replace /usr/src/gnu directory contents with the CVS version. If anyone could find the original copies of gsrc09.024~026 (and make sure they are from the same CD-ROM; better get an ISO image), life would become a lot easier.</p>
<p>Keep posting cool stuff!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: neozeed		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2010/12/05/netbsd-0-8-kernel-boots/comment-page-1/#comment-125154</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neozeed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2014 16:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=310#comment-125154</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://virtuallyfun.com/2010/12/05/netbsd-0-8-kernel-boots/comment-page-1/#comment-125132&quot;&gt;Wojciech&lt;/a&gt;.

Its been four years so I&#039;m not 100% sure.  I think I eventually found a 0.8 distribution of netbsd without having to back port from 386 bsd]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2010/12/05/netbsd-0-8-kernel-boots/comment-page-1/#comment-125132">Wojciech</a>.</p>
<p>Its been four years so I&#8217;m not 100% sure.  I think I eventually found a 0.8 distribution of netbsd without having to back port from 386 bsd</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Wojciech		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2010/12/05/netbsd-0-8-kernel-boots/comment-page-1/#comment-125132</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wojciech]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2014 15:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=310#comment-125132</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hello, do you mean, you&#039;re looking for patchkit-0.2.2.tar.z? 
According to the README.1st
 &quot;This patchkit represents the complete 0.2.2 patchkit, containing
patch numbers 1 - 109.  It&#039;s also the first patchkit to use the
new experimental patch range 10000 &#038; &quot;optional products&quot; range 90000.&quot;
The file is located at
ftp://minnie.tuhs.org/BSD/386bsd-0.1/unofficial/patch-kit/0.2.2

Or you&#039;re looking for something else related to 386BSD?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, do you mean, you&#8217;re looking for patchkit-0.2.2.tar.z?<br />
According to the README.1st<br />
 &#8220;This patchkit represents the complete 0.2.2 patchkit, containing<br />
patch numbers 1 &#8211; 109.  It&#8217;s also the first patchkit to use the<br />
new experimental patch range 10000 &amp; &#8220;optional products&#8221; range 90000.&#8221;<br />
The file is located at<br />
<a href="ftp://minnie.tuhs.org/BSD/386bsd-0.1/unofficial/patch-kit/0.2.2" rel="ugc">ftp://minnie.tuhs.org/BSD/386bsd-0.1/unofficial/patch-kit/0.2.2</a></p>
<p>Or you&#8217;re looking for something else related to 386BSD?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: herdware		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2010/12/05/netbsd-0-8-kernel-boots/comment-page-1/#comment-39361</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[herdware]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 14:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=310#comment-39361</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://virtuallyfun.com/2010/12/05/netbsd-0-8-kernel-boots/comment-page-1/#comment-39237&quot;&gt;neozeed&lt;/a&gt;.

I tried mailing you at jsteve()supermega... since that was where I got new comment reply from. Maybe that didn&#039;t work?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2010/12/05/netbsd-0-8-kernel-boots/comment-page-1/#comment-39237">neozeed</a>.</p>
<p>I tried mailing you at jsteve()supermega&#8230; since that was where I got new comment reply from. Maybe that didn&#8217;t work?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: neozeed		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2010/12/05/netbsd-0-8-kernel-boots/comment-page-1/#comment-39237</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neozeed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 00:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=310#comment-39237</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://virtuallyfun.com/2010/12/05/netbsd-0-8-kernel-boots/comment-page-1/#comment-39231&quot;&gt;herdware&lt;/a&gt;.

wow that would be cool to have one way or the other.  It has been a few years and I don&#039;t recall if I made  available the full list of what I changed, other than I vaguely recall it was on gunkies.

Let me know if you can share the NetBSD 0.8, so I can add it on sourceforge.... :)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2010/12/05/netbsd-0-8-kernel-boots/comment-page-1/#comment-39231">herdware</a>.</p>
<p>wow that would be cool to have one way or the other.  It has been a few years and I don&#8217;t recall if I made  available the full list of what I changed, other than I vaguely recall it was on gunkies.</p>
<p>Let me know if you can share the NetBSD 0.8, so I can add it on sourceforge&#8230;. 🙂</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: herdware		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2010/12/05/netbsd-0-8-kernel-boots/comment-page-1/#comment-39231</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[herdware]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2013 19:34:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=310#comment-39231</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I recently got hold of the real binary distribution of 0.8 (and 386BSD 0.1 with some precompiled ports). I&#039;ll check soon(tm) how it looks when that boots.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently got hold of the real binary distribution of 0.8 (and 386BSD 0.1 with some precompiled ports). I&#8217;ll check soon(tm) how it looks when that boots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
