<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: CPM/86	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2010/06/14/cpm86/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2010/06/14/cpm86/</link>
	<description>Fun with Virtualization</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2020 07:50:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: klokwrkblu		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2010/06/14/cpm86/comment-page-1/#comment-247285</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[klokwrkblu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2020 07:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=248#comment-247285</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://virtuallyfun.com/2010/06/14/cpm86/comment-page-1/#comment-247085&quot;&gt;neozeed&lt;/a&gt;.

portected mode:

thats what im trying to do

but i cant get an example to it actually work

any thinkg straight foward out there

the ultimate plan is long mode]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2010/06/14/cpm86/comment-page-1/#comment-247085">neozeed</a>.</p>
<p>portected mode:</p>
<p>thats what im trying to do</p>
<p>but i cant get an example to it actually work</p>
<p>any thinkg straight foward out there</p>
<p>the ultimate plan is long mode</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: neozeed		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2010/06/14/cpm86/comment-page-1/#comment-247085</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neozeed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2020 08:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=248#comment-247085</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://virtuallyfun.com/2010/06/14/cpm86/comment-page-1/#comment-247069&quot;&gt;klokwrkblu&lt;/a&gt;.

The more insane thing to have done would be to look at the 68k version of CP/M (written in C) and getting it to run on the 386 in protected mode...................

Insane!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2010/06/14/cpm86/comment-page-1/#comment-247069">klokwrkblu</a>.</p>
<p>The more insane thing to have done would be to look at the 68k version of CP/M (written in C) and getting it to run on the 386 in protected mode&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
<p>Insane!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: klokwrkblu		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2010/06/14/cpm86/comment-page-1/#comment-247069</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[klokwrkblu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2020 06:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=248#comment-247069</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[https://vetusware.com/download/CPM-86%20For%20The%20IBM%201.1/?id=15509


https://uploadfiles.io/gwfr692t

you cant get a more complete collection anywhere else
better hurry and grab it before its gone again.

The vetus ware link is just in case.

Although its an older &#038; less complete release, there is more than enough to biuld your system from the ground up as you see fit.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://vetusware.com/download/CPM-86%20For%20The%20IBM%201.1/?id=15509" rel="nofollow ugc">https://vetusware.com/download/CPM-86%20For%20The%20IBM%201.1/?id=15509</a></p>
<p><a href="https://uploadfiles.io/gwfr692t" rel="nofollow ugc">https://uploadfiles.io/gwfr692t</a></p>
<p>you cant get a more complete collection anywhere else<br />
better hurry and grab it before its gone again.</p>
<p>The vetus ware link is just in case.</p>
<p>Although its an older &amp; less complete release, there is more than enough to biuld your system from the ground up as you see fit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Luposian		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2010/06/14/cpm86/comment-page-1/#comment-217996</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Luposian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jul 2019 03:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=248#comment-217996</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;This is the original BOOT ROM distributed with CP/M for the SBC 86/12 and 204 Controller. The listing is truncated on the right, but can be reproduced by assembling ROM.A86 from the distribution disk.&quot;

and

&quot;This program resides in two 2716 EPROM&#039;s (2K each) at location 0FF000H on the SBC 86/12 CPU board.  ROM 0 contains the even memory locations, and ROM 1 contains the odd addresses.&quot;

This comes from a file called ROM.A86 in a source code archive called c8611src.zip.

Is this the equivilant of the ROM BIOS in a regular PC?  If so, then there might be a path of understanding in this, since it&#039;s the actual source code.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;This is the original BOOT ROM distributed with CP/M for the SBC 86/12 and 204 Controller. The listing is truncated on the right, but can be reproduced by assembling ROM.A86 from the distribution disk.&#8221;</p>
<p>and</p>
<p>&#8220;This program resides in two 2716 EPROM&#8217;s (2K each) at location 0FF000H on the SBC 86/12 CPU board.  ROM 0 contains the even memory locations, and ROM 1 contains the odd addresses.&#8221;</p>
<p>This comes from a file called ROM.A86 in a source code archive called c8611src.zip.</p>
<p>Is this the equivilant of the ROM BIOS in a regular PC?  If so, then there might be a path of understanding in this, since it&#8217;s the actual source code.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: neozeed		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2010/06/14/cpm86/comment-page-1/#comment-217814</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neozeed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2019 21:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=248#comment-217814</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://virtuallyfun.com/2010/06/14/cpm86/comment-page-1/#comment-217803&quot;&gt;Luposian&lt;/a&gt;.

Ages ago I thought that taking CP/M for the 68000 would be a better choice as it&#039;s written in C.  Although I didn&#039;t get far enough...

And there was that VAX port..]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2010/06/14/cpm86/comment-page-1/#comment-217803">Luposian</a>.</p>
<p>Ages ago I thought that taking CP/M for the 68000 would be a better choice as it&#8217;s written in C.  Although I didn&#8217;t get far enough&#8230;</p>
<p>And there was that VAX port..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Luposian		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2010/06/14/cpm86/comment-page-1/#comment-217803</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Luposian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2019 19:54:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=248#comment-217803</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Anyone here familiar with CP/M-86 1.1 source code?  I&#039;m looking to &quot;modernize&quot; CP/M-86 1.1 by (initially) just fixing up CPM.SYS (I have the three necessary files: BIOS/CBIOS.A86, CCP.A86, and BDOS.A86) a bit.  Rather than using the &quot;patches&quot; (AT and Y2K) on the binaries, why not fix the problem in the source code, so the patches aren&#039;t necessary?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone here familiar with CP/M-86 1.1 source code?  I&#8217;m looking to &#8220;modernize&#8221; CP/M-86 1.1 by (initially) just fixing up CPM.SYS (I have the three necessary files: BIOS/CBIOS.A86, CCP.A86, and BDOS.A86) a bit.  Rather than using the &#8220;patches&#8221; (AT and Y2K) on the binaries, why not fix the problem in the source code, so the patches aren&#8217;t necessary?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: neozeed		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2010/06/14/cpm86/comment-page-1/#comment-217482</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neozeed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2019 06:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=248#comment-217482</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://virtuallyfun.com/2010/06/14/cpm86/comment-page-1/#comment-217481&quot;&gt;Jared&lt;/a&gt;.

https://web.archive.org/web/20140419021145/http://anachronda.homeunix.com:8000/~rivie/exchange/

Try exchange... Its decapitated CP/M and can manipulate various disk images..]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2010/06/14/cpm86/comment-page-1/#comment-217481">Jared</a>.</p>
<p><a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20140419021145/http://anachronda.homeunix.com:8000/~rivie/exchange/" rel="nofollow ugc">https://web.archive.org/web/20140419021145/http://anachronda.homeunix.com:8000/~rivie/exchange/</a></p>
<p>Try exchange&#8230; Its decapitated CP/M and can manipulate various disk images..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jared		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2010/06/14/cpm86/comment-page-1/#comment-217481</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jared]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2019 06:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=248#comment-217481</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Late to the party by a whopping 7 years.  I have a copy of CP/M-86 1.1 (.IMG disk image) on an emulator called PCEm.  It&#039;s running in XT (8088) mode, based on the BIOS I&#039;m using.  I&#039;d like to tinker with some CP/M-86 source code files, but they&#039;re in Windows/MacOS X.  Not sure how to get them into a 160K floppy image.  I can create a 160K disk image in PCEm or an image program in Windows, but other than the fact it shows the same screen of dots (when I dir from the B drive), it never shows any files I&#039;ve injected.  I can&#039;t read disk images I create from PCEm in the Windows image program (says it&#039;s corrupted or something), yet disk images I create in the image program show nothing when I try to dir them from the B drive in PCEm.  Weird.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Late to the party by a whopping 7 years.  I have a copy of CP/M-86 1.1 (.IMG disk image) on an emulator called PCEm.  It&#8217;s running in XT (8088) mode, based on the BIOS I&#8217;m using.  I&#8217;d like to tinker with some CP/M-86 source code files, but they&#8217;re in Windows/MacOS X.  Not sure how to get them into a 160K floppy image.  I can create a 160K disk image in PCEm or an image program in Windows, but other than the fact it shows the same screen of dots (when I dir from the B drive), it never shows any files I&#8217;ve injected.  I can&#8217;t read disk images I create from PCEm in the Windows image program (says it&#8217;s corrupted or something), yet disk images I create in the image program show nothing when I try to dir them from the B drive in PCEm.  Weird.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Peter Dassow		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2010/06/14/cpm86/comment-page-1/#comment-18232</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Dassow]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2012 11:45:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=248#comment-18232</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi, this is a very late feedback, but it&#039;s really &quot;up to date&quot;.
Plz feel free to visit my blog (again) and look how beautiful CP/M-86 runs in VMWare, VirtualBox and even on a Thinkpad T23 - slightly more modern than a PC/XT.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, this is a very late feedback, but it&#8217;s really &#8220;up to date&#8221;.<br />
Plz feel free to visit my blog (again) and look how beautiful CP/M-86 runs in VMWare, VirtualBox and even on a Thinkpad T23 &#8211; slightly more modern than a PC/XT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anonymous		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2010/06/14/cpm86/comment-page-1/#comment-322</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 00:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=248#comment-322</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Good news and bad news.  I actually found some of my old magazines, but it looks like I pared down the collection so the  issues I NOW want, are gone.  I found 5 ProFiles issues (8/86, 5/87, 8/87, 8/88) and 3 Micro Cornucopia (37 - 39).  Amazed I found any really (I think my collection use to go back to 84 or so).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thanks for the tip on multicore.  If I have any problems, I&#039;ll give it a try.  So far everything is working.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good news and bad news.  I actually found some of my old magazines, but it looks like I pared down the collection so the  issues I NOW want, are gone.  I found 5 ProFiles issues (8/86, 5/87, 8/87, 8/88) and 3 Micro Cornucopia (37 &#8211; 39).  Amazed I found any really (I think my collection use to go back to 84 or so).</p>
<p>Thanks for the tip on multicore.  If I have any problems, I&#39;ll give it a try.  So far everything is working.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
