<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Visual C++ 4.0 arrived today!	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2009/08/12/visual-c-4-0-arrived-today/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2009/08/12/visual-c-4-0-arrived-today/</link>
	<description>Fun with Virtualization</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2023 20:00:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Malcolm		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2009/08/12/visual-c-4-0-arrived-today/comment-page-1/#comment-322108</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Malcolm]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2023 20:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=152#comment-322108</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Just browsing old stuff and stumbled onto this again, and only now noticed the screenshot on the back of the Visual C++ 4 box is essentially a forgery.  Visual C++ 4.0 shipped alongside Windows 95 (with its UI), but NT didn&#039;t get that UI for another year, and Alpha/MIPS don&#039;t run Windows 95.  Even installing NewShell on NT 3.51 doesn&#039;t result in something like that screenshot.  Either that screenshot came from the Intel version (which is not in this box!) or it came from a pre-release NT 4 that wasn&#039;t public.

In related news, the NT 4.0 SDK has updated headers and libs for RISC (but not the compilers.)  The &quot;newest&quot; MIPS/PPC Visual C++ is bundling the NT 3.51 SDK, so the NT 4.0 SDK is a nice update.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just browsing old stuff and stumbled onto this again, and only now noticed the screenshot on the back of the Visual C++ 4 box is essentially a forgery.  Visual C++ 4.0 shipped alongside Windows 95 (with its UI), but NT didn&#8217;t get that UI for another year, and Alpha/MIPS don&#8217;t run Windows 95.  Even installing NewShell on NT 3.51 doesn&#8217;t result in something like that screenshot.  Either that screenshot came from the Intel version (which is not in this box!) or it came from a pre-release NT 4 that wasn&#8217;t public.</p>
<p>In related news, the NT 4.0 SDK has updated headers and libs for RISC (but not the compilers.)  The &#8220;newest&#8221; MIPS/PPC Visual C++ is bundling the NT 3.51 SDK, so the NT 4.0 SDK is a nice update.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: neozeed		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2009/08/12/visual-c-4-0-arrived-today/comment-page-1/#comment-123573</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[neozeed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2014 14:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=152#comment-123573</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://virtuallyfun.com/2009/08/12/visual-c-4-0-arrived-today/comment-page-1/#comment-123556&quot;&gt;Malcolm&lt;/a&gt;.

I have an ISO of this (I think)..
MSVC40PPC
10eb631b0bda6a7a8185f3b314fc0bc8 VisualC++4.0PPC.iso

But I got this long after I was running NT 4.0 on a RS/6000 ..]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://virtuallyfun.com/2009/08/12/visual-c-4-0-arrived-today/comment-page-1/#comment-123556">Malcolm</a>.</p>
<p>I have an ISO of this (I think)..<br />
MSVC40PPC<br />
10eb631b0bda6a7a8185f3b314fc0bc8 VisualC++4.0PPC.iso</p>
<p>But I got this long after I was running NT 4.0 on a RS/6000 ..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Malcolm		</title>
		<link>https://virtuallyfun.com/2009/08/12/visual-c-4-0-arrived-today/comment-page-1/#comment-123556</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Malcolm]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2014 13:05:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://virtuallyfun.com/?p=152#comment-123556</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Are you interested in ppc?  I bought a copy of this same software, but the sticker on the front of my box explicitly includes powerpc.  Opening the box I have three CDs, one for each architecture.  I really wish NT4 ppc could run on old Apple hardware...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you interested in ppc?  I bought a copy of this same software, but the sticker on the front of my box explicitly includes powerpc.  Opening the box I have three CDs, one for each architecture.  I really wish NT4 ppc could run on old Apple hardware&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
